Okla. Stat. » Title 22 — CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 928 (2026)

Repealed by Laws 1998, c. 133, § 603, eff. July 1, 1999

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NOTE: Laws 1998, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 2, § 23 amended the effective date of Laws 1997, c. 133, § 603 from July 1, 1998, to July 1, 1999.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1959–1988 · leading case: Reddell v. State, 543 P.2d 574 (Okla. Crim. App. 1975).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Reddell v. State, 543 P.2d 574 (Okla. Crim. App. 1975). “” And, 22 O.S.1971, § 928 provides: “If the jury assess a punishment, whether of imprisonment or fine, greater than the highest limit declared by law for the offense of which they convict the defendant, the court shall disregard the excess and pronounce sentence and render…”
Curtis v. State, 763 P.2d 377 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). “The jury set punishment at twenty (20) years imprisonment on both counts, and the trial judge, pursuant to 22 O.S.1981, § 928, reduced the sentence on Count II to ten (10) years, the maximum allowable under 21 O.”
Farnsworth v. State, 343 P.2d 744 (Okla. Crim. App. 1959). “1921 [22 O.S.1951 § 928]; In re Taylor, 7 S.D. 382 , 64 N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.