Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 24, § 118 (2026)

Tests for determining when transfer is made or obligation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

incurred. For the purposes of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act: 1. A transfer is made: a. with respect to an asset that is real property other than a fixture, but including the interest of a seller or purchaser under a contract for the sale of the asset, when the transfer is so far perfected that a good-faith purchaser of the asset from the debtor against whom applicable law permits the transfer to be perfected cannot acquire an interest in the asset that is superior to the interest of the transferee; and b. with respect to an asset that is not real property or that is a fixture, when the transfer is so far perfected that a creditor on a simple contract cannot acquire a judicial lien otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act that is superior to the interest of the transferee. 2. If applicable law permits the transfer to be perfected as provided for in paragraph 1 of this section and the transfer is not so perfected before the commencement of an action for relief pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, the transfer is deemed made immediately before the commencement of the action. 3. If applicable law does not permit the transfer to be perfected as provided for in paragraph 1 of this section, the transfer is made when it becomes effective between the debtor and the transferee.

4. A transfer is not made until the debtor has acquired rights in the asset transferred. 5. An obligation is incurred: a. if oral, when it becomes effective between the parties; or b. if evidenced by a writing, when the writing executed by the obligor is delivered to or for the benefit of the obligee. Added by Laws 1986, c. 100, § 7, eff. Nov. 1, 1986.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2010–2013 · leading case: Tronox Inc. v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (In Re Tronox Inc.), 429 B.R. 73 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010).
Tronox Inc. v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (In Re Tronox Inc.), 429 B.R. 73 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010). · cites it 4× “” Okla. Stat. tit. 24, § 118 . For the purposes of the Oklahoma UFTA, a transfer is made “with respect to an asset that is not real property or that is a fixture, when the transfer is so far perfected that a creditor on a simple contract cannot acquire a judicial lien otherwise…”
Tronox Inc. v. Kerr McGee Corp. (In re Tronox Inc.), 503 B.R. 239 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013). “” Okla. Stat. tit. 24, § 118 (5)(b). . The Circuit Court was there construing the New York Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act (“UFCA”), but there is no substantive difference from the subsequent UFTA for purposes of the "collapsing” doctrine.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.