Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 36, § 1427 (2026)
Renumbered as § 1435.30 of this title by Laws 2001, c
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
156, § 35, eff. Nov. 1, 2001.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1991–1992 · leading case: Worden v. Comm'r, 64 T.C.M. 408 (Tax Ct. 1992).
Worden v. Comm'r, 64 T.C.M. 408 (Tax Ct. 1992). “orporation who, for a fee, holds himself or itself out to the public as engaged in the business of offering any advice, counsel, opinion or service with respect to the benefits, advantages or disadvantages promised under any policy of insurance that could be issued or delivered…”
Horton Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Robinson, 824 P.2d 397 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991). “MEMORANDUM OPINION JONES, Judge: This appeal from summary judgment appears to be a case of first impression in this jurisdiction involving the interpretation of 36 O.S.1983 § 1427, set forth in its entirety as an addendum to this opinion.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 36, § 1427(1): 1 case
Horton Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Robinson, 824 P.2d 397 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991). “MEMORANDUM OPINION JONES, Judge: This appeal from summary judgment appears to be a case of first impression in this jurisdiction involving the interpretation of 36 O.S.1983 § 1427, set forth in its entirety as an addendum to this opinion.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 36, § 1427(A)(2): 1 case
Horton Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Robinson, 824 P.2d 397 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991). “MEMORANDUM OPINION JONES, Judge: This appeal from summary judgment appears to be a case of first impression in this jurisdiction involving the interpretation of 36 O.S.1983 § 1427, set forth in its entirety as an addendum to this opinion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.