Okla. Stat. » Title 41 — LANDLORD AND TENANT
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 101 (2026)

Short title

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Oklahoma Residential Landlord and Tenant Act". Added by Laws 1978, c. 257, § 1, eff. Oct. 1, 1978.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1985–2022 · leading case: Wagoner v. Bennett, 814 P.2d 476 (Okla. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wagoner v. Bennett, 814 P.2d 476 (Okla. 1991). · cites it 2× “We have not before addressed the issue of whether punitive damages may be awarded for wrongful eviction along with double damages under the Oklahoma Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, 41 O.”
Progressive Direct Ins. Co. v. Pope, 507 P.3d 688 (Okla. 2022). “41 O.S.1981 § 101 et seq ., we stated: "Considering the legislature's apparent intent in enacting the ORLTA together with prior case law, we find that the tenant's cause of action is regulated and determined by the statute , as is the remedy .”
Gaines v. Providence Apts., 750 P.2d 125 (Okla. 1987). “The Court of Appeals reversed on the basis of 41 O.S.1981 §§ 101 et seq., the Oklahoma Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.”
Cordes v. Wood, 918 P.2d 76 (Okla. 1996). “1986) and the Oklahoma Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, 41 O.S.1991 § 101 et seq., do not apply to a single-family dwelling.”
Rodgers v. Rosen, 737 P.2d 562 (Okla. 1987). “Its subsequent grant of appellee’s motion for new trial was the result of an erroneous reassessment of the facts upon which the judgment had been entered. The opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division III is VACATED.”
In re Mims, 195 B.R. 472 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1996). “In Oklahoma, residential leases are governed by the Oklahoma Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (“ORLTA”), Okla.Stat. tit. 41, §§ 101 et seq. With respect to circumstances where the tenant has failed to timely pay the required rent, Okla.”
Fudge v. United Urban Indian Council, Inc., 803 P.2d 268 (Okla. Civ. App. 1990). “” This statement of the law applied to both commercial and residential lease contracts until 1978 when the Oklahoma Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, 41 O.S.Supp.1990 §§ 101 through 136 was enacted.”
Morris v. Behrens, 2021 OK CIV APP 35, 499 P.3d 39. “See generally 41 O.S. §§101 et seq. More specifically, Appellant contends the trial court "relied on the incorrect theory that 41 O.”
Bokis v. Champion Fin. Corp., 608 F. Supp. 585 (W.D. Okla. 1985). “All authority cited by defendant is prior to 1978, the effective date of the Oklahoma Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, 41 O.S. §§ 101 et seq. (1981). In that legislation, the Oklahoma Legislature enacted a comprehensive scheme for governing the relations between landlords…”
McAdoo v. Vici Cmty. Dev. Corp, No. 5:19-cv-00515, 2020 WL 2529368 (W.D. Okla. May 18, 2020). “§ 3560 ; (7) violation of the Oklahoma Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (ORLT), 41 O.S. § 101, et seq., and; (8) breach of contract based upon the federal and state laws cited above.”
Watson v. Vici Cmty. Dev. Corp, No. 5:20-cv-01011 (W.D. Okla. Dec. 15, 2020). “; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, § 504; the Oklahoma Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, 41 O.S. § 101 et seq.; and the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act, 15 O.”
Watson v. Vici Cmty. Dev. Corp, No. 5:20-cv-01011, 2021 WL 1394477 (W.D. Okla. Apr. 12, 2021). “§ 794 (a); the Oklahoma Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, 41 O.S. §§ 101 et seq.; and the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act, 15 O.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.