Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 156 (2026)

Presentation of claim - Limitation of actions - Filing -

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Notice - Wrongful death. A. Any person having a claim against the state or a political subdivision within the scope of Section 151 et seq. of this title shall present a claim to the state or political subdivision for any appropriate relief including the award of money damages. B. Except as provided in subsection H of this section, and not withstanding any other provision of law, claims against the state or a political subdivision are to be presented within one (1) year of the date the loss occurs. A claim against the state or a political subdivision shall be forever barred unless notice thereof is presented within one (1) year after the loss occurs. C. A claim against the state shall be in writing and filed with the Office of the Risk Management Administrator of the Office of Management and Enterprise Services who shall immediately notify the Attorney General and the agency concerned and conduct a diligent investigation of the validity of the claim within the time specified for approval or denial of claims by Section 157 of this title. A claim may be filed by certified mail with return receipt requested. A claim which is mailed shall be considered filed upon receipt by the Office of the Risk Management Administrator. D. A claim against a political subdivision shall be in writing and filed with the office of the clerk of the governing body. E. The written notice of claim to the state or a political subdivision shall state the date, time, place and circumstances of the claim, the identity of the state agency or agencies involved, the amount of compensation or other relief demanded, the name, address and telephone number of the claimant, the name, address and telephone number of any agent authorized to settle the claim, and any and all other information required to meet the reporting requirements of the Medicare Secondary Payer Mandatory Reporting Provisions in Section 111 of the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (MMSEA) through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Failure to state either the date, time, place and circumstances and amount of compensation demanded, or any information requested to comply with the reporting claims to CMS under MMSEA shall not invalidate the notice unless the claimant

declines or refuses to furnish such information after demand by the state or political subdivision. The time for giving written notice of claim pursuant to the provisions of this section does not include the time during which the person injured is unable due to incapacitation from the injury to give such notice, not exceeding ninety (90) days of incapacity. F. If the written notice of claim demands relief for personal injuries, the claimant shall provide the name and address of all health care providers who treated the claimant since the date and time of the circumstances claimant set forth in the notice of claim required by subsection E of this section and the date of the notice required by subsection E of this section. For each health care provider required to be identified, the claimant shall provide a HIPPA compliant authorization for release of health information. Failure to provide the name and address of all health care providers and the HIPPA compliant authorization required by this subsection shall not invalidate the notice required by subsection E of this section unless the claimant declines or refuses to furnish such information after demanded by the state or political subdivision. G. If the written notice of claim demands relief for loss of earnings, the claimant shall provide the documentation of the loss of earnings since the date and time of the circumstances claimant set forth in the notice of claim required by subsection E of this section and the date of the notice required by subsection E of this section. Failure to provide the documentation required by this subsection shall not invalidate the notice required by subsection E of this section unless claimant declines or refuses to furnish such information after demanded by the state or political subdivision. H. If the written notice of claim demands relief for losses of real or personal property, the claimant shall provide the amount of the property loss claimed, the method used to calculate the amount of loss, documentation relied upon in determining the amount of loss, and proof of the claimant's ownership of property. Failure to provide the documentation required by this subsection shall not invalidate the notice required by subsection E of this section unless claimant declines or refuses to furnish such information after demanded by the state or political subdivision. I. When the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission, notice may be presented by the personal representative within one (1) year after the death occurs. If the person for whose death the claim is made has presented notice that would have been sufficient had he lived, an action for wrongful death may be brought without any additional notice. J. Claims and suits against resident physicians or interns shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Titles 12 and 76 of the Oklahoma Statutes.

K. For purposes of claims based on wrongful felony conviction resulting in imprisonment provided for in Section 154 of this title, loss occurs on the date that the claimant receives a pardon based on actual innocence from the Governor or the date that the claimant receives judicial relief absolving the claimant of guilt based on actual innocence; provided, for persons whose basis for a claim occurred prior to the effective date of this act, the claim must be submitted within one (1) year after the effective date of this act. Added by Laws 1978, c. 203, § 6, eff. July 1, 1978. Amended by Laws 1984, c. 226, § 8, eff. Oct. 1, 1985; Laws 1985, c. 357, § 2, operative Oct. 1, 1985; Laws 1986, c. 247, § 23, operative July 1, 1986; Laws 1988, c. 61, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1988; Laws 1988, c. 241, § 4, eff. Nov. 1, 1988; Laws 1992, c. 285, § 4, emerg. eff. May 25, 1992; Laws 2001, c. 42, § 2, eff. July 1, 2002; Laws 2003, c. 304, § 4, emerg. eff. May 28, 2003; Laws 2006, c. 102, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 2006; Laws 2010, c. 365, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 2010; Laws 2012, c. 304, § 206; Laws 2022, c. 183, § 2, eff. Nov. 1, 2022. NOTE: The effective date of Laws 2001, c. 42, § 2 was amended from Nov. 1, 2001, to July 1, 2002, by Laws 2001, 1st Ex. Sess., c. 4, § 1, emerg. eff. Oct. 24, 2001.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 110 cases (21 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: I. T. K. v. Mounds Pub. Schs., 2019 OK 59 (Okla. 2019).
I. T. K. v. Mounds Pub. Schs., 2019 OK 59 (Okla. 2019). · cites it 30× “The trial court stated plaintiff was in substantial compliance with the notice requirements in 51 O.S. § 156, but the Journal Entry of Judgment does not state such; 2.”
Crawford v. Osu Med. Trust, 2022 OK 25 (Okla. 2022). · cites it 123× “The trial court granted OSUMC's motion to dismiss for failure to present notice of the claim within one year of the date the loss occurred, pursuant to 51 O.S.Supp.2012 § 156 51 O.S.Supp.2012 § 156 12 O.”
Minie v. Hudson, 934 P.2d 1082 (Okla. 1997). · cites it 10× “See also, 51 O.S.Supp.1992 § 156(A) and (B). 10 . The third-party petition grew out of a quiet title/adverse possession action filed by Therin Edward Minie and Diane Minie (Minie) on March 31, 1993, against Hudson.”
Gutteridge v. State of Oklahoma, 878 F.3d 1233 (10th Cir. 2018). · cites it 3× “See Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 51, § 156 (B) (“A claim against the state or a political subdivision shall be forever barred unless notice thereof is presented within one (1) year after the loss occurs.”
Mansell v. City of Lawton, 901 P.2d 826 (Okla. 1995). · cites it 15× “See, 51 O.S.Supp. 1984 § 156, which became effective in October of 1985.”
Cruse v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 910 P.2d 998 (Okla. 1995). · cites it 7× “Cruse contends that the right to maintain this action was preserved upon timely compliance with the provisions of 51 O.S.1991, §§ 156 and 157; that 51 O.S.”
Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Mem'l Hosp., 917 P.2d 456 (Okla. 1996). · cites it 4× “The GTCA's text neither authorizes [25] the government to seek nor prohibits it from inviting a needed amendment of the claim's notice beyond the quantum of data required to be furnished by 51 O.S.1991 § 156. [26] Public policy would generally favor amendments.”
Johns Ex Rel. Johns v. Wynnewood Sch. Bd. of Educ., 656 P.2d 248 (Okla. 1982). · cites it 7× “Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, alleging the requirements of 51 O.S. § 156 have not been fulfilled and thus plaintiffs have not brought themselves within the limited waiver of sovereign immunity contained in the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act.”
Beason v. I. E. Miller Servs., Inc., 441 P.3d 1107 (Okla. 2019). · cites it 4× “2d 470, 473 (six-month time bar in 51 O.S.1981 § 156(C) of the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, (an Act including statutory caps on damages), did not violate Art.”
Whitley v. Oologah Indep. Sch. Dist. No. I-4 of Rogers Cnty., 741 P.2d 455 (Okla. 1987). · cites it 6× “This section, 51 O.S.1981 § 156, provided: 8 A. Any person having a claim against a political subdivision or an employee within the scope of this act shall petition the political subdivision for any appropriate relief including the award of money damages.”
Frazier v. Bryan Mem'l Hosp. Auth., 775 P.2d 281 (Okla. 1989). · cites it 3× “Hospital moved for dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted on the grounds that 1) Authority should be treated as a political subdivision of the state and 2) the action against all the defendants collectively called Hospital is barred because,…”
Roberts v. South Oklahoma City Hosp. Trust, 742 P.2d 1077 (Okla. 1986). · cites it 6× “On May 23, 1983, the hospital amended its answer asserting the failure of the husband to comply with the notice provisions of the Act, 51 O.S.Supp. 1979 § 156(D) [2] which requires notice to be given within one year after the alleged injury causing the death, and raising a…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 156(A) — 9 cases
Minie v. Hudson, 934 P.2d 1082 (Okla. 1997). “See also, 51 O.S.Supp.1992 § 156(A) and (B). 10 . The third-party petition grew out of a quiet title/adverse possession action filed by Therin Edward Minie and Diane Minie (Minie) on March 31, 1993, against Hudson.”
Wirtz v. Glanz, 932 P.2d 540 (Okla. Civ. App. 1996).
Duncan v. City of Stroud, 2015 OK CIV APP 28 (Okla. Civ. App. 2015).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 156(B) — 29 cases
Cruse v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 910 P.2d 998 (Okla. 1995). “Cruse contends that the right to maintain this action was preserved upon timely compliance with the provisions of 51 O.S.1991, §§ 156 and 157; that 51 O.S.”
Ross Ex Rel. Ross v. City of Shawnee, 683 P.2d 535 (Okla. 1984).
Minie v. Hudson, 934 P.2d 1082 (Okla. 1997). “See also, 51 O.S.Supp.1992 § 156(A) and (B). 10 . The third-party petition grew out of a quiet title/adverse possession action filed by Therin Edward Minie and Diane Minie (Minie) on March 31, 1993, against Hudson.”
Gurley v. Mem'l Hosp. of Guymon, 770 P.2d 573 (Okla. 1989).
Kluver v. Weatherford Hosp. Auth., 859 P.2d 1081 (Okla. 1993).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 156(C) — 12 cases
Whitley v. Oologah Indep. Sch. Dist. No. I-4 of Rogers Cnty., 741 P.2d 455 (Okla. 1987). “This section, 51 O.S.1981 § 156, provided: 8 A. Any person having a claim against a political subdivision or an employee within the scope of this act shall petition the political subdivision for any appropriate relief including the award of money damages.”
Beason v. I. E. Miller Servs., Inc., 441 P.3d 1107 (Okla. 2019). “2d 470, 473 (six-month time bar in 51 O.S.1981 § 156(C) of the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, (an Act including statutory caps on damages), did not violate Art.”
Doe Ex rel.Doe v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. I-89, 780 P.2d 659 (Okla. 1988).
Reirdon v. Wilburton Bd. of Educ., 611 P.2d 239 (Okla. 1980).
Mansell v. City of Lawton, 901 P.2d 826 (Okla. 1995). “See, 51 O.S.Supp. 1984 § 156, which became effective in October of 1985.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 156(D) — 12 cases
I. T. K. v. Mounds Pub. Schs., 2019 OK 59 (Okla. 2019). “The trial court stated plaintiff was in substantial compliance with the notice requirements in 51 O.S. § 156, but the Journal Entry of Judgment does not state such; 2.”
Minie v. Hudson, 934 P.2d 1082 (Okla. 1997). “See also, 51 O.S.Supp.1992 § 156(A) and (B). 10 . The third-party petition grew out of a quiet title/adverse possession action filed by Therin Edward Minie and Diane Minie (Minie) on March 31, 1993, against Hudson.”
Roberts v. South Oklahoma City Hosp. Trust, 742 P.2d 1077 (Okla. 1986). “On May 23, 1983, the hospital amended its answer asserting the failure of the husband to comply with the notice provisions of the Act, 51 O.S.Supp. 1979 § 156(D) [2] which requires notice to be given within one year after the alleged injury causing the death, and raising a…”
Hammons v. Muskogee Med. Ctr. Auth., 697 P.2d 539 (Okla. 1985).
Alburtus v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 1 of Tulsa Cnty., 2020 OK CIV APP 39 (Okla. Civ. App. 2020).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 156(E) — 9 cases
Mansell v. City of Lawton, 901 P.2d 826 (Okla. 1995). “See, 51 O.S.Supp. 1984 § 156, which became effective in October of 1985.”
Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Mem'l Hosp., 917 P.2d 456 (Okla. 1996). “The GTCA's text neither authorizes [25] the government to seek nor prohibits it from inviting a needed amendment of the claim's notice beyond the quantum of data required to be furnished by 51 O.S.1991 § 156. [26] Public policy would generally favor amendments.”
Duncan v. City of Stroud, 346 P.3d 446 (Okla. Civ. App. 2015).
Hardy v. Bezdicek, 1999 OK CIV APP 77 (Okla. Civ. App. 1999).
Duncan v. City of Stroud, 2015 OK CIV APP 28 (Okla. Civ. App. 2015).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 156(F) — 4 cases
Beason v. I. E. Miller Servs., Inc., 441 P.3d 1107 (Okla. 2019). “2d 470, 473 (six-month time bar in 51 O.S.1981 § 156(C) of the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, (an Act including statutory caps on damages), did not violate Art.”
Spencer v. Nelson, 2024 OK 63 (Okla. 2024).
State v. Dixon, 912 P.2d 842 (Okla. 1996).
Beason v. I. E. Miller Servs., Inc., 2019 OK 28 (Okla. 2019).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 156(G) — 2 cases
Anderson v. Eichner, 890 P.2d 1329 (Okla. 1994).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 156(b) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.