Okla. Stat. » Title 51 — OFFICERS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 36.2A (2026)

Form of loyalty oath or affirmation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The oath or affirmation required by this act, same being cumulative to the oath of office required by Section 1 of Article XV of the Oklahoma Constitution, shall be as follows: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America and the Constitution and the laws of the State of Oklahoma, and that I will faithfully discharge, according to the best of my ability, the duties of my office or employment during such time as I am _______ __________________________________________________________________ (Here put name of office, or, if an employee, insert “An Employee Of _____________” followed by the complete designation of the employing officer, agency, authority, commission, department or institution.) ___________________________ Affiant Subscribed and sworn to before me this __ day of _______, ___. _________________________________ Notary Public, or other officer authorized to administer oaths or affirmations. Added by Laws 1968, c. 260, § 1, emerg. eff. April 29, 1968. Amended by Laws 2004, c. 408, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 2004.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1979–1995 · leading case: Nesbitt v. Apple, 891 P.2d 1235 (Okla. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nesbitt v. Apple, 891 P.2d 1235 (Okla. 1995). · cites it 3× “Watts took and subscribed to the loyalty oath set forth in 51 O.S. § 36.2A. 4. J.C. Watts served as Corporation Commissioner for the State of Oklahoma from January 14, 1991.”
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Mourer, 596 P.2d 882 (Okla. 1979). · cites it 2× “However, 51 O.S.1971, § 36.2A prescribes the form of loyalty oath to be given and describes the loyalty oath as being “cumulative” to the oath required by Sec.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.