Okla. Stat. » Title 57 — PRISONS AND REFORMATORIES
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 571 (2026)

See the following versions:

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OS 57-571v1 (HB 3936, Laws 2024, c. 59, § 40) OS 57-571v2 (SB 541, Laws 2025, c. 162, § 3)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case: Lewallen v. State, 2016 OK CR 4, 370 P.3d 828.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lewallen v. State, 2016 OK CR 4, 370 P.3d 828. · cites it 10× “¶4 When a defendant with two or more felony convictions is convicted of an offense enumerated in 57 O.S.2011, § 571, his punishment range is 20 years to life.”
Brink v. State, 2021 OK CR 1, 481 P.3d 1267. · cites it 3× “1(5), and all three are classified as violent crimes under 57 O.S.Supp.2015, § 571. ¶9 Thus, I find that the better reading of the drive-by shooting statute is that this crime is a separate shooting-related crime situated alongside the other violent assaults in Section 652,…”
Hunter v. Beck, 244 F. App'x 848 (10th Cir. 2007). “7 (D)(1), a prisoner denied parole cannot be considered for parole again until three years have passed, if the person was convicted of a violent crime under Okla. Stat. tit. 57 § 571. Hunter's crime of first-degree murder is a violent crime under the statute and according to his…”
Lewallen v. State, 2016 OK CR 4. · cites it 12× “¶4 When a defendant with two or more felony convictions is convicted of an offense enumerated in 57 O.S.2011, § 571, his punishment range is 20 years to life.”
Maynard v. Brown, 860 P.2d 801 (Okla. Crim. App. 1993). “1984, § 573, as defined in 57 O.S.Supp.1984, § 571(5)(dd). The Legislature appears to have taken Section 571(5)(dd) directly from the heading of 21 O.”
Tomlin v. State ex rel. Dep't of Corr., 814 P.2d 154 (Okla. Crim. App. 1991). “Only sentences for the offenses listed in 57 O.S.Supp.1984, § 571(5), are denied credits under the Act, therefore Petitioner shall be granted emergency time credit if he meets the three criteria set forth in Section 573 and a declaration of emergency is declared pursuant to…”
Johnson v. Crow, No. 21-6093 (10th Cir. Jan. 10, 2022). “” Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 571 (2)(qq). 3 Appellate Case: 21-6093 Document: 010110629353 Date Filed: 01/10/2022 Page: 4 an 85 percent crime.”
Jackson v. Harpe, No. 24-6011 (10th Cir. Aug. 9, 2024). “1 ; Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 571 . Jackson’s application was denied because he is imprisoned for first-degree murder.”
Parker v. Tensley, No. 26-6000 (10th Cir. May 29, 2026). “3(D); see also Okla. Stat. tit. 57 § 571(2)(j). Parker filed a request to apply for resentencing under the OSA with the state district court.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 571(2)(j): 1 case
Parker v. Tensley, No. 26-6000 (10th Cir. May 29, 2026). “3(D); see also Okla. Stat. tit. 57 § 571(2)(j). Parker filed a request to apply for resentencing under the OSA with the state district court.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 571(2)(w): 2 cases
Lewallen v. State, 2016 OK CR 4, 370 P.3d 828. “¶4 When a defendant with two or more felony convictions is convicted of an offense enumerated in 57 O.S.2011, § 571, his punishment range is 20 years to life.”
Lewallen v. State, 2016 OK CR 4. “¶4 When a defendant with two or more felony convictions is convicted of an offense enumerated in 57 O.S.2011, § 571, his punishment range is 20 years to life.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 571(5): 1 case
Tomlin v. State ex rel. Dep't of Corr., 814 P.2d 154 (Okla. Crim. App. 1991). “Only sentences for the offenses listed in 57 O.S.Supp.1984, § 571(5), are denied credits under the Act, therefore Petitioner shall be granted emergency time credit if he meets the three criteria set forth in Section 573 and a declaration of emergency is declared pursuant to…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 571(5)(dd): 1 case
Maynard v. Brown, 860 P.2d 801 (Okla. Crim. App. 1993). “1984, § 573, as defined in 57 O.S.Supp.1984, § 571(5)(dd). The Legislature appears to have taken Section 571(5)(dd) directly from the heading of 21 O.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.