Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 587 (2026)

Penalty

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Any person required to register pursuant to the provisions of the Sex Offenders Registration Act who violates any provision of said act shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a Class B5 felony offense. Any person convicted of a violation of this section shall be punished by imprisonment in the custody of the Department of Corrections for not more than five (5) years, a fine not to exceed Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), or both such fine and imprisonment. B. Any person required to register pursuant to the Sex Offenders Registration Act who fails to comply with the established

guidelines for Global Positioning System (GPS) monitoring shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a Class B5 felony offense punishable by a fine not to exceed One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment in the custody of the county jail for not more than one (1) year, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Added by Laws 1989, c. 212, § 7, eff. Nov. 1, 1989. Amended by Laws 1995, c. 142, § 7, eff. July 1, 1995; Laws 1997, c. 260, § 7, eff. Nov. 1, 1997; Laws 1998, c. 347, § 3, eff. Nov. 1, 1998; Laws 2001, c. 51, § 3, eff. July 1, 2001; Laws 2006, c. 284, § 10, emerg. eff. June 7, 2006; Laws 2025, c. 486, § 178, eff. Jan. 1, 2026.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: State v. Hurt, 2014 OK CR 17, 340 P.3d 7.
State v. Hurt, 2014 OK CR 17, 340 P.3d 7. · cites it 2× “Appellee waived preliminary hearing but filed his Motion to Dismiss and argued that the Sex Offenders Registration Act (57 O.S.2011, §§ 581-590.2) could not be retroactively applied to him.”
Osburn v. Oklahoma Dep't of Corr., 2013 OK 89, 313 P.3d 926. “3 T 2 On June 21, 2002, Osburn pled guilty to felony charges in two separate criminal cases for failure to register as a sex offender in violation of 57 O.S., § 587 (CF 2001-426 and CF 2002-226; Kay County, Oklahoma).”
Donaldson v. City of El Reno, 2025 OK 9, 565 P.3d 346. · cites it 4× “Laws at 558 (codified at 57 O.S.Supp.1989, § 587). Id. § 8, 1989 Okla.”
State v. Hurt, 2014 OK CR 17. · cites it 2× “Appellee waived preliminary hearing but filed his Motion to Dismiss and argued that the Sex Offenders Registration Act (57 O.S.2011, §§ 581-590.2) could not be retroactively applied to him.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.