Okla. Stat. » Title 75 — STATUTES AND REPORTS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3 (2026)

See the following versions:

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OS 75-250.3v1 (HB 2728, Laws 2025, c. 258, § 5) OS 75-250.3v2 (SB 995, Laws 2025, c. 420, § 1)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1988–2024 · leading case: Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm'n, 873 P.2d 1001 (Okla. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm'n, 873 P.2d 1001 (Okla. 1994). · cites it 16× “[28] The Oklahoma APA, 75 O.S.Supp. 1992 § 250.3(2), defines the term "rule" as: "any agency statement or group of related statements of general applicability and future effect that implements, interprets or prescribes law or policy, or describes the procedure or practice…”
Oklahoma Pub. Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Dep't of Cent. Servs., 2002 OK 71 (Okla. 2002). · cites it 4× “[15] We agree that 75 O.S.Supp.1999 § 250.3 does not require every agency decision to be in the form of a rule.”
State ex rel. Oklahoma Bd. of Med. Licensure & Supervision v. Pinaroc, 46 P.3d 114 (Okla. 2002). · cites it 4× “"Fingl agency order" means an order that includes findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Section 812 of this title, is dispositive of an individual proceeding unless there is a request for rehearing, reopening, or reconsideration pursuant to Section 317 of this…”
Lockett v. Evans, 2014 OK 34 (Okla. 2014). · cites it 3× “The definition of "rule" within the context of the Administrative Procedures Act is found at 75 O.S. §250.3(17), which provides: 17. "Rule" means any agency statement or group of related statements of general applicability and future effect that implements, interprets or…”
Stewart v. Rood, 796 P.2d 321 (Okla. 1990). · cites it 2× “” 75 O.S.Supp.1989, § 250.3(3). 9 We have little trouble ruling a permit like that involved here issued under the OSWMA falls within the definition of a license under the OAPA.”
King v. Gorczyk, 2003 VT 34 (Vt. 2003). “Code § 28-32-01 (2001); Okla. Stat. tit. 75 § 250.3(15) (2002); Or.”
State Ex Rel. Okla. State Bd. of Med. Licensure & Supervision v. Rivero, 2021 OK 31 (Okla. 2021). “8(D) (In 2019 the legislature amended the statute to expressly state information obtained during an investigation of misconduct is confidential, but upon being introduced in an administrative individual proceeding before the Oklahoma Board of Nursing the information becomes an…”
Dewey v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Ret. Sys., 2001 OK 40 (Okla. 2001). “75 O.S.Supp.1992 § 250.3: 7. "Individual proceeding" means the formal process employed by an agency having jurisdiction by law to resolve issues of law or fact between parties and which results in the exercise of discretion of a judicial nature; 8.”
Browning v. State Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 812 P.2d 1372 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “…adopted" rule, which then becomes a "[p]romulgated rule" when it is filed and published in accordance with the Act. 75 O.S.Supp. 1990 § 250.3.”
Purcell v. Parker, 2020 OK 83 (Okla. 2020). “Under the Oklahoma Administrative Procedures Act, 75 O.S. 2011 §250.3, this minimum standard is met with an Individual Proceeding which is defined as: .”
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. I-20 of Muskogee Cnty. v. Oklahoma State Dep't of Educ., 65 P.3d 612 (Okla. 2003). “Title 75 O.S.2001 § 250.3 provides in pertinent part: .”
In Re Spilman, 2010 OK 70 (Okla. 2010). “75 O.S.1991 § 250.3, nor is the Bar Association, as an arm of this court, such an agency for the purpose of that Act.”
Show all 24 citing cases →
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(11) — 1 case
Cherokee Data Comput. Parts & Serv., Inc. v. Oklahoma Dep't of Labor, 122 P.3d 56 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(14) — 1 case
Leo v. Oklahoma Water Resources Bd., 2023 OK 96 (Okla. 2023).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(15) — 2 cases
Oklahoma Pub. Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Dep't of Cent. Servs., 2002 OK 71 (Okla. 2002). “[15] We agree that 75 O.S.Supp.1999 § 250.3 does not require every agency decision to be in the form of a rule.”
King v. Gorczyk, 2003 VT 34 (Vt. 2003). “Code § 28-32-01 (2001); Okla. Stat. tit. 75 § 250.3(15) (2002); Or.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(17) — 4 cases
Lockett v. Evans, 2014 OK 34 (Okla. 2014). “The definition of "rule" within the context of the Administrative Procedures Act is found at 75 O.S. §250.3(17), which provides: 17. "Rule" means any agency statement or group of related statements of general applicability and future effect that implements, interprets or…”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. State Ex. Rel. Off. of Juv. Affairs, 2021 OK CIV APP 40 (Okla. Civ. App. 2021).
Lockett v. Evans, 2014 OK 34 (Okla. 2014).
Question Submitted by: The Honorable Ryan Walters, State Superintendent of Pub. Instruction, 2024 OK AG 11 (Okla. Att’y Gen. 2024).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(19) — 1 case
Question Submitted by: The Honorable Mark McBride, Oklahoma House of Representatives, Dist. 53, 2023 OK AG 3 (Okla. Att’y Gen. 2023).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(2) — 1 case
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm'n, 873 P.2d 1001 (Okla. 1994). “[28] The Oklahoma APA, 75 O.S.Supp. 1992 § 250.3(2), defines the term "rule" as: "any agency statement or group of related statements of general applicability and future effect that implements, interprets or prescribes law or policy, or describes the procedure or practice…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(2)(b) — 1 case
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm'n, 873 P.2d 1001 (Okla. 1994). “[28] The Oklahoma APA, 75 O.S.Supp. 1992 § 250.3(2), defines the term "rule" as: "any agency statement or group of related statements of general applicability and future effect that implements, interprets or prescribes law or policy, or describes the procedure or practice…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(3) — 1 case
Stewart v. Rood, 796 P.2d 321 (Okla. 1990). “” 75 O.S.Supp.1989, § 250.3(3). 9 We have little trouble ruling a permit like that involved here issued under the OSWMA falls within the definition of a license under the OAPA.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(4) — 1 case
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm'n, 873 P.2d 1001 (Okla. 1994). “[28] The Oklahoma APA, 75 O.S.Supp. 1992 § 250.3(2), defines the term "rule" as: "any agency statement or group of related statements of general applicability and future effect that implements, interprets or prescribes law or policy, or describes the procedure or practice…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(5) — 3 cases
State ex rel. Oklahoma Bd. of Med. Licensure & Supervision v. Pinaroc, 46 P.3d 114 (Okla. 2002). “"Fingl agency order" means an order that includes findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Section 812 of this title, is dispositive of an individual proceeding unless there is a request for rehearing, reopening, or reconsideration pursuant to Section 317 of this…”
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm'n, 873 P.2d 1001 (Okla. 1994). “[28] The Oklahoma APA, 75 O.S.Supp. 1992 § 250.3(2), defines the term "rule" as: "any agency statement or group of related statements of general applicability and future effect that implements, interprets or prescribes law or policy, or describes the procedure or practice…”
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. State, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n, 2002 OK 42 (Okla. 2002).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(6) — 1 case
Stewart v. Rood, 796 P.2d 321 (Okla. 1990). “” 75 O.S.Supp.1989, § 250.3(3). 9 We have little trouble ruling a permit like that involved here issued under the OSWMA falls within the definition of a license under the OAPA.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(7) — 2 cases
Cherokee Data Comput. Parts & Serv., Inc. v. Oklahoma Dep't of Labor, 122 P.3d 56 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005).
French v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Corr., 2010 OK CIV APP 68 (Okla. Civ. App. 2010).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3(8) — 2 cases
Question Submitted by: The Honorable Glen Mulready, Ins. Comm'r, Oklahoma Ins. Dept., 2023 OK AG 1 (Okla. Att’y Gen. 2023).
Leo v. Oklahoma Water Resources Bd., 2023 OK 96 (Okla. 2023).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.