Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 84, § 143 (2026)
Gift to witness void - Exception
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
All beneficial devises, legacies or gifts whatever, made or given in any will to a subscribing witness thereto, are void unless there are two other competent subscribing witnesses to the same; but a mere charge on the estate of the testator for the payment of debts does not prevent his creditors from being competent witnesses to the will. R.L.1910, § 8377.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1987–1989 · leading case: Ziegelgruber v. Harrison ex rel. Harrison, 738 P.2d 964 (Okla. Civ. App. 1987).
Ziegelgruber v. Harrison ex rel. Harrison, 738 P.2d 964 (Okla. Civ. App. 1987). “The statute does not particularly call for a “disinterested witness”; however, Okla.Stat. tit. 84, § 143 (1981) states: “All beneficial devises, legacies or gifts whatever, made or given in any will to a subscribing witness thereto, are void unless there are two other competent…”
Matter of Est. of Harrison, 738 P.2d 964 (Okla. Civ. App. 1987). “The statute does not particularly call for a "disinterested witness"; however, Okla. Stat. tit. 84, § 143 (1981) states: "All beneficial devises, legacies or gifts whatever, made or given in any will to a subscribing witness thereto, are void unless there are two other competent…”
Alexander v. Overt, 768 P.2d 378 (Okla. Civ. App. 1989). “Based upon the notary public’s testimony, the trial court found that the notary did not sign as a subscribing witness and, because there was but one valid subscribing witness other than the primary legatee under the will, held that such bequest was made void by 84 O.S.1981 §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.