Summary Judgment
22 groups with Oregon opinions1912–2026
- Materiality of Factual Disputes20 opinions · 1990–2024Summarizing facts for summary judgment review · Determining material facts for jury confusion · Defining material fact in transaction decisions
- Summary judgment; Judgment motions; Burden8 opinions · 1912–2016Burden of proof on summary judgment motions · Determining seller negligence regarding product risk · Defining the legal concept of duress
- Settlement Agreements and Litigation Resolution Doctrines7 opinions · 1994–2023Determining accrual of cause of action in torts · Claim preclusion barring relitigation of same claim · Issue preclusion not limited by necessity to prior adjudication
- Rule 56 Standard and Purpose6 opinions · 1978–2005Examining summary judgment based on statute of limitations · Analyzing summary judgment and witness sequestration rules
- Evidentiary Standards and Burden of Proof5 opinions · 1920–1977Distinguishing the two meanings of burden of proof
- Legislative history permitting dismissal while summary judgment is pending
- Determining the nature of real market value disputes
- Reviewability of denial of motion for summary judgment · Mandatory requirement for stating legal grounds in summary judgment orders
- Determining speculation versus evidence for summary judgment · Precluding summary judgment based on conflicting evidence · Denying summary judgment without proper notice and hearing
- Requirements for granting summary judgment motion
- Determining summary judgment feasibility in complex factual disputes · Summary judgment for seller on single piece of equipment
- Analyzing the scope of a specific legal rule · Evaluating directed verdict standard for summary judgment
- Charging orders not transferring partner's management rights
- Determining applicability of federal summary judgment rule · Granting summary judgment for lack of present injury
- Imputing laches to the commonwealth in pennsylvania
- Considering admissible evidence in summary judgment motions
- Distinguishing factual inferences from summary judgment standards
- Creating issues of fact with inconsistent affidavits
- Determining genuine issue of material fact for constitutional claim
- Public obligation to provide evidence and witness testimony
- Determining ripeness for inverse condemnation claims
- Prior restraints on expression and judicial review
Counts are Oregon courts’ opinions citing pages in each group (an opinion citing two issues counts in both).
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law