105.420
Findings; policy.
(1) The Legislative Assembly recognizes that there exists residential property
in this state that is insanitary and unsafe and that many citizens, especially
those with lower incomes, are forced to live in and occupy these properties.
(2) The
Legislative Assembly further recognizes that there are residential properties
in this state that have not been maintained in compliance with basic sanitary
and habitability standards and which have become abandoned. These conditions
contribute to the spread of disease and criminal activity, create urban blight
and community deterioration, adversely affect the state’s economic and social
viability and otherwise detrimentally impact the public’s health, safety and
welfare.
(3) In order to
correct these conditions, it is necessary to revitalize these residential
properties and thus add to the overall housing stock of this state. The
Legislative Assembly deems it necessary to authorize county and municipal
governments to adopt and implement receivership programs to allow for the
upgrading of substandard and abandoned residential properties. [1989 c.649 §2]
Notes of Decisions
Liles v. Damon Corp., 198 P.3d 926 (Or. 2008).
· cites it 2× “430(2) provides: “At least 60 days prior to the filing of an application for appointment of a receiver pursuant to ORS 105.420 to 105.455, the city or county shall give written notice by regular mail to all interested parties of its intent to file the application and information…”
City of Portland v. Ristick, 945 P.2d 98 (Or. Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 3× “Appellant, the City of Portland, seeks review of a trial court judgment awarding it some, but not all, of the costs that the city sought as a result of rehabilitation efforts undertaken by a receiver pursuant to the Oregon Housing Receivership Act, ORS 105.420 through ORS…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 105.420(3) — 1 case
City of Portland v. Ristick, 945 P.2d 98 (Or. Ct. App. 1997).
“Appellant, the City of Portland, seeks review of a trial court judgment awarding it some, but not all, of the costs that the city sought as a result of rehabilitation efforts undertaken by a receiver pursuant to the Oregon Housing Receivership Act, ORS 105.420 through ORS…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.