Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 105.668 (2026)

Immunity from liability for injury or property damage arising from use of trail or structures in public easement or right of way

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      105.668 Immunity from liability for injury or property damage arising from use of trail or structures in public easement or right of way. (1) As used in this section:

      (a) “Local government” has the meaning given that term in ORS 174.116.

      (b) “Structures” means improvements in a trail, including, but not limited to, stairs and bridges, that are accessible by a user on foot, on an equine or on a bicycle or other nonmotorized vehicle or conveyance.

      (c) “Unimproved right of way” means a platted or dedicated public right of way over which a street, road or highway has not been constructed to the standards and specifications of the local government with jurisdiction over the public right of way and for which the local government has not expressly accepted responsibility for maintenance.

      (2) In a city with a population of 500,000 or greater, a personal injury or property damage resulting from use of a trail that is in a public easement or in an unimproved right of way, or from use of structures in the public easement or unimproved right of way, by a user on foot, on an equine or on a bicycle or other nonmotorized vehicle or conveyance does not give rise to a private claim or right of action based on negligence against:

      (a) The city;

      (b) The officers, employees or agents of the city to the extent the officers, employees or agents are entitled to defense and indemnification under ORS 30.285;

      (c) The owner of land abutting the public easement or unimproved right of way in the city; or

      (d) A nonprofit corporation and its volunteers for the construction and maintenance of the trail or the structures in a public easement or unimproved right of way in the city.

      (3) A local government to which subsection (2) of this section does not apply may opt to limit liability in the manner established by subsection (2) of this section by ordinance, resolution, rule, order or other regulation for:

      (a) The local government;

      (b) The officers, employees or agents of the local government to the extent the officers, employees or agents are entitled to defense and indemnification under ORS 30.285;

      (c) The owner of land abutting the public easement or unimproved right of way in the local government; or

      (d) A nonprofit corporation and its volunteers for the construction and maintenance of the trail or the structures in a public easement or unimproved right of way in the local government.

      (4) This section does not grant immunity from liability:

      (a) Except as provided in subsection (2)(b) or (3)(b) of this section, to a person that receives compensation for providing assistance, services or advice in relation to conduct that leads to a personal injury or property damage.

      (b) For gross negligence or reckless, wanton or intentional misconduct.

      (c) For an activity for which a person is strictly liable without regard to fault. [2011 c.528 §1; 2024 c.64 §§5,8; 2025 c.220 §1]

 

      105.670 [1971 c.780 §4; repealed by 1995 c.456 §9]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2016–2016 · leading case: Landis v. Limbaugh, 385 P.3d 1139 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).
Landis v. Limbaugh, 385 P.3d 1139 (Or. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 3× “Washington County moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted the motion on the basis that the county was immune under Oregon’s recreational use statutes, ORS 105.668 to 105.700. Plaintiff appeals, contending that the trial court erred in determining that the county…”
Johnson v. Gibson, 369 P.3d 1151 (Or. 2016). “ORS 105.668(2) immunizes a “city with a population of 500,000 or more” and its “officers, employees, or agents” from liability for injury or damage resulting from the use of a trail or structures in a public easement or an unimproved right of way.”
Johnson v. Gibson (Or. 2016). “ORS 105.668(2) immunizes a “city with a population of 500,000 or more” and its “officers, employ- ees, or agents” from liability for injury or damage resulting from the use of a trail or structures in a public easement or an unimproved right of way.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 105.668(2) — 2 cases
Johnson v. Gibson, 369 P.3d 1151 (Or. 2016). “ORS 105.668(2) immunizes a “city with a population of 500,000 or more” and its “officers, employees, or agents” from liability for injury or damage resulting from the use of a trail or structures in a public easement or an unimproved right of way.”
Johnson v. Gibson (Or. 2016). “ORS 105.668(2) immunizes a “city with a population of 500,000 or more” and its “officers, employ- ees, or agents” from liability for injury or damage resulting from the use of a trail or structures in a public easement or an unimproved right of way.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.