107.455 Effect
of separation statutes or judgments on subsequent dissolution proceedings. The provisions of law pertaining
to separation are not intended to and shall not repeal or affect any existing
law pertaining to the granting of a judgment of dissolution of marriage. The
entry of a judgment of separation under ORS 107.475 shall not be a bar to a
suit for dissolution by either party. A decree or judgment of dissolution of
marriage granted by a court of this or any other state upon constructive
service of summons does not affect an award of support or maintenance in a
judgment of separation made pursuant to ORS 107.095 or 107.105. [Formerly
107.310; 2003 c.576 §126]
Notes of Decisions
In re the Marriage of Patterson, 136 P.3d 1177 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).
“” ORS 107.455 provides, in part: “The provisions of law pertaining to separation are not intended to and shall not repeal or affect any existing law pertaining to the granting of a decree of dissolution of marriage.”
In re the Marriage of Wagner, 747 P.2d 400 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).
“ORS 107.455 to ORS 107.475. Husband filed a response, and negotiations between the parties led to the September 4, 1985, entry of a stipulated judgment of unlimited separation.”
State ex rel. Moreau v. Moreau, 741 P.2d 932 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).
“ORS 107.455 authorizes attorney fees in a contempt proceeding to compel compliance with a dissolution *204 decree.”
In re the Marriage of Jones, 936 P.2d 372 (Or. Ct. App. 1997).
“465(1), the separation statute specifically provides, in part: “The provisions of law pertaining to separation are not intended to and shall not repeal or affect any existing law pertaining to the granting of a decree of dissolution of marriage.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.