107.475 Court
to determine duration of separation; modification or vacation of judgment. The court shall determine and fix
in its judgment the duration of the separation. At the expiration of such time,
the judgment shall have no further effect. However, no rights created or
granted in the judgment which have vested shall be affected by its termination.
Upon motion of a party and service upon the other party of notice in the manner
provided by law for service of summons, the court may renew or extend the
duration. When the judgment is for unlimited separation, a party may by motion
alleging that the cause for separation no longer exists and after due service
of notice upon the other party in the manner provided by law for service of
summons, apply for an order modifying or vacating the judgment, subject to the
provisions of ORS 107.135. [1973 c.502 §14; 2003 c.576 §128]
SUMMARY DISSOLUTION
PROCEDURE
Notes of Decisions
In re the Marriage of Patterson, 136 P.3d 1177 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “” ORS 107.475 provides that the duration of a separation is to be fixed by the court, and “at the expiration of such time, the judgment shall have no further effect.”
McArthur v. Paradis, 120 P.3d 904 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
“Furthermore, we disagree with father that the trial court “understood” mother’s request to “waive” the reporting requirement of ORS 107.475(7). There is no evidence in the record that mother intended to waive any requirement of that statute.”
In re the Marriage of Wagner, 747 P.2d 400 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).
“455 to ORS 107.475. Husband filed a response, and negotiations between the parties led to the September 4, 1985, entry of a stipulated judgment of unlimited separation.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 107.475(7) — 1 case
McArthur v. Paradis, 120 P.3d 904 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
“Furthermore, we disagree with father that the trial court “understood” mother’s request to “waive” the reporting requirement of ORS 107.475(7). There is no evidence in the record that mother intended to waive any requirement of that statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.