Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 109.754 (2026)

Notice; opportunity to be heard; joinder

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      109.754 Notice; opportunity to be heard; joinder. (1) Before a child custody determination is made under ORS 109.701 to 109.834, notice and an opportunity to be heard in accordance with the standards of ORS 109.724 must be given to all persons entitled to notice under the law of this state as in child custody proceedings between residents of this state, any parent whose parental rights have not been previously terminated and any person having physical custody of the child.

      (2) ORS 109.701 to 109.834 do not govern the enforceability of a child custody determination made without notice or an opportunity to be heard.

      (3) The obligation to join a party and the right to intervene as a party in a child custody proceeding under ORS 109.701 to 109.834 are governed by the law of this state as in child custody proceedings between residents of this state. [1999 c.649 §17]

 

      Note: See note under 109.701.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. P., 537 P.3d 593 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. P., 537 P.3d 593 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 4× “” ORS 109.754(1). When a child custody determination is made “without notice or an opportunity to be heard,” the UCCJEA (enacted in ORS 109.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 109.754(1): 1 case
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. P., 537 P.3d 593 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “” ORS 109.754(1). When a child custody determination is made “without notice or an opportunity to be heard,” the UCCJEA (enacted in ORS 109.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 109.754(2): 1 case
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. P., 537 P.3d 593 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “” ORS 109.754(1). When a child custody determination is made “without notice or an opportunity to be heard,” the UCCJEA (enacted in ORS 109.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.