Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 109.724 (2026)

Notice to persons outside state

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      109.724 Notice to persons outside state. (1) Notice required for the exercise of jurisdiction when a person is outside this state may be given in a manner prescribed by the law of this state for service of process or by the law of the state in which the service is made. Notice must be given in a manner reasonably calculated to give actual notice but may be by publication if other means are not effective.

      (2) Proof of service may be made in the manner prescribed by the law of this state or by the law of the state in which the service is made. If service is made by mail, proof of service may be a receipt signed by the addressee or other evidence of delivery to the addressee.

      (3) Notice is not required for the exercise of jurisdiction with respect to a person who submits to the jurisdiction of the court. [1999 c.649 §8]

 

      Note: See note under 109.701.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2002–2023 · leading case: Matter of Marriage of Medill, 40 P.3d 1087 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
Matter of Marriage of Medill, 40 P.3d 1087 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “834 binds all persons who have been served in accordance with the laws of this state or notified in accordance with ORS 109.724 or who have submitted to the jurisdiction of the court, and who have been given an opportunity to be heard.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. P., 537 P.3d 593 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “834, notice and an opportunity to be heard in accordance with the standards of ORS 109.724 must be given to [among others,] any parent whose parental rights have not been previously terminated * * *.”
In re the Marriage of Epler, 309 P.3d 1133 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “834 binds all persons who have been served in accordance with the laws of this state or notified in accordance with ORS 109.724 or who have submitted to the jurisdiction of the court, and who have been given an opportunity to be heard.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.