Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 111.015 (2026)

Application of chapter 591, Oregon Laws 1969

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      111.015 Application of chapter 591, Oregon Laws 1969. Except as specifically provided otherwise in chapter 591, Oregon Laws 1969, on July 1, 1970, chapter 591, Oregon Laws 1969, applies to wills of decedents dying thereafter, and a will executed before July 1, 1970, shall be considered lawfully executed if the application of ORS 112.255 would make it so, but the construction of a will executed before July 1, 1970, shall be governed by the law in effect on the date of execution unless a contrary intent is established by the will. [1969 c.591 §303; 2016 c.42 §12]

 

      111.020 [Repealed by 1969 c.591 §305]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1972–1994 · leading case: In Re Est. of Crohn, 494 P.2d 258 (Or. Ct. App. 1972).
In Re Est. of Crohn, 494 P.2d 258 (Or. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 3× “If a will was revoked prior to the effective date of the new probate code, does the revocation remain effective? The only logical answer is, “yes.”
First Nat. Bank of Oregon v. Schwerin, 635 P.2d 388 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 4× “The parties agree that ORS 111.015 [2] mandates the application of the Oregon law in effect on January 11, 1955.”
Thomas v. State ex rel. Senior & Disabled Servs. Div., 878 P.2d 1081 (Or. 1994). “ORS 111.015(2). The remedy of statutory interest under ORS 82.”
Thomas v. Senior & Disabled Serv. Div., 878 P.2d 1081 (Or. 1994). “ORS 111.015(2). The remedy of statutory interest under ORS 82.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 111.015(2) — 2 cases
Thomas v. State ex rel. Senior & Disabled Servs. Div., 878 P.2d 1081 (Or. 1994). “ORS 111.015(2). The remedy of statutory interest under ORS 82.”
Thomas v. Senior & Disabled Serv. Div., 878 P.2d 1081 (Or. 1994). “ORS 111.015(2). The remedy of statutory interest under ORS 82.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.