Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 116.103 (2026)

Objections to final account and petition

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      116.103 Objections to final account and petition. Any person entitled to notice under ORS 116.093 may, within the time fixed for the filing, file in the estate proceeding objections to the final account and petition for distribution, specifying the particulars of the objections. Upon the filing of objections the court shall fix the time for hearing thereon. [1969 c.591 §177]

 

      116.105 [Repealed by 1969 c.591 §305]

 

      116.110 [Repealed by 1969 c.591 §305]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1977–2017 · leading case: Tilton v. Lee, 298 P.3d 559 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tilton v. Lee, 298 P.3d 559 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 4× “See ORS 116.103 (“Any person entitled to notice under ORS 116.”
First Interstate Bank v. Haynes, 699 P.2d 1168 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). “145(1); ORS 116.103. The claim is barred under ORS 115.”
Matter of Est. of Vander Galien, 614 P.2d 127 (Or. Ct. App. 1980). “* * *” Pursuant to ORS 116.103, "[a]ny person entitled to notice under ORS 116.”
Adams v. West Coast Trust, 338 P.3d 171 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “In a letter opinion of September 15, 2009, the court rejected petitioners’ June 25, 2009, objections to the final accounting as untimely, reasoning that those objections had not been filed by the May 26,2009, deadline fixed by the court, as required by ORS 116.103. The probate…”
Hobbs v. Harrington, 391 P.3d 915 (Or. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “ORS 116.103 provides: “Any person entitled to notice under ORS 116.”
Matter of Est. of Hayes, 571 P.2d 1264 (Or. Ct. App. 1977). “See, ORS 116.103. However other sections of the code provide that probate proceedings are generally equitable in nature, including de novo appellate review.”
Thomas v. State ex rel. Senior & Disabled Servs. Div., 878 P.2d 1081 (Or. 1994). “” ORS 116.103 provides in part: “Any person entitled to notice under ORS 116.”
Thomas v. Senior & Disabled Serv. Div., 878 P.2d 1081 (Or. 1994). “" ORS 116.103 provides in part: "Any person entitled to notice under ORS 116.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.