130.050 UTC
201. Role of court in administration of trust. (1) A court may intervene in the
administration of a trust to the extent the court’s jurisdiction is invoked by
an interested person or as provided by law.
(2) A trust is
not subject to continuing judicial supervision unless ordered by a court.
(3) A judicial
proceeding may relate to any matter involving a trust’s administration,
including a request for instructions or a declaratory judgment action. [2005
c.348 §12]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2022 · leading case:
Lewis v. Worley, 507 P.3d 814 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
Lewis v. Worley, 507 P.3d 814 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 18× “The trial court concluded that petitioner had standing under ORS 130.050 and therefore rejected respondent’s claim for fees under ORS 20.”
Tseng v. Tseng, 352 P.3d 74 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “ORS 130.050 broadly authorizes any “interested person” to invoke the court’s jurisdiction to intervene in the administration of the trust; it does not require that the person’s interest be “vested” in order to invoke the court’s jurisdiction.”
Peterson v. Dept. of Rev., 23 Or. Tax 554 (Or. T.C. 2019).
“Gordon, 43 Or App 511 , 603 P2d 1196 (1979) (applying former ORS 130.050(1) (1985)). 4 See Allison v. Dept.”
Lamka v. Dept. of Rev., 23 Or. Tax 566 (Or. T.C. 2019).
“Although Oregon income tax law does not generally incorporate procedural provisions of federal income tax law,5 the court here considers for context any federal tax law defi- nition of the term that might have existed in 1982 or 1985. Section 6161(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue…”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 130.050(1): 2 cases
Peterson v. Dept. of Rev., 23 Or. Tax 554 (Or. T.C. 2019).
“Gordon, 43 Or App 511 , 603 P2d 1196 (1979) (applying former ORS 130.050(1) (1985)). 4 See Allison v. Dept.”
Lamka v. Dept. of Rev., 23 Or. Tax 566 (Or. T.C. 2019).
“Although Oregon income tax law does not generally incorporate procedural provisions of federal income tax law,5 the court here considers for context any federal tax law defi- nition of the term that might have existed in 1982 or 1985. Section 6161(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.