Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 133.763 (2026)

Facts documents must show

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      133.763 Facts documents must show. A warrant of extradition must not be issued unless the documents presented by the executive authority making the demand show that:

      (1) Except in cases arising under ORS 133.767, the accused, when demanded upon a charge of crime, was present in the demanding state at the time of the commission of the alleged crime and thereafter fled from that state;

      (2) The person demanded is in this state; and

      (3) They constitute full compliance with the requirements of ORS 133.753. [Formerly 147.050]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1981–2001 · leading case: Thomas v. Keeney, 771 P.2d 249 (Or. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Thomas v. Keeney, 771 P.2d 249 (Or. 1989). · cites it 2× “Doran, 439 US 282, 289 , 99 S Ct 530 , 58 L Ed 2d 521 (1978); see also ORS 133.763. 5 ORS 133.763 requires the demanding state to show, inter alia, that the person accused “was present in the demanding state at the time of the commission of the alleged crime and thereafter fled…”
Betschart v. Spinden, 20 P.3d 202 (Or. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “3 ORS 133.763 requires that the documents supporting a demand for extradition under ORS 133.”
State ex rel. Eggleston v. Hatrak, 636 P.2d 1017 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 3× “753 1 had not been met in the documents accompanying the governor’s warrant; (2) the statutory requirements regarding facts *977 necessary to be shown in the demand under ORS 133.763 2 had not been met; and (3) plaintiff had not been identified as the party wanted by Michigan.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 133.763(1) — 1 case
Betschart v. Spinden, 20 P.3d 202 (Or. Ct. App. 2001). “3 ORS 133.763 requires that the documents supporting a demand for extradition under ORS 133.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.