Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 133.767 (2026)

Extradition of person not present in demanding state at time of commission of crime

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

133.767 Extradition of person not present in demanding state at time of commission of crime. The Governor of this state may also surrender, on demand of the executive authority of any other state, any person in this state charged in such other state in the manner provided in ORS 133.763 with committing an act in this state, or in a third state, intentionally resulting in a crime in the state whose executive authority is making the demand. The provisions of ORS 133.743 to 133.857 not otherwise inconsistent shall apply to such cases, notwithstanding that the accused was not in that state at the time of the commission of the crime and has not fled therefrom. [Formerly 147.060; 1985 c.565 §12; 2005 c.22 §105]

133.770 [Renumbered 136.345]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1981–2003 · leading case: Zimmerman v. State, 79 P.3d 910 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Zimmerman v. State, 79 P.3d 910 (Or. Ct. App. 2003). “See ORS 133.767 (governor of state may surrender person upon demand of executive authority of other state).”

State ex rel. Eggleston v. Hatrak, 636 P.2d 1017 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). “763 provides: "A warrant of extradition must not be issued unless the documents presented by the executive authority making the demand show that: "(1) Except in cases arising under ORS 133.767, the accused, when demanded upon a charge of crime, was present in the demanding state…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.