Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 135.709 (2026)

Exclusiveness of procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      135.709 Exclusiveness of procedure. No crime can be compromised nor can any proceeding for the prosecution or punishment thereof be stayed upon a compromise, except as provided in ORS 135.703 to 135.709 and 135.745 to 135.757. [Formerly 134.040]

 

SUFFICIENCY OF ACCUSATORY INSTRUMENTS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: State v. Binh Thi Thanh Ha, 728 P.2d 932 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Binh Thi Thanh Ha, 728 P.2d 932 (Or. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “” ORS 135.709 provides: “No crime can be compromised nor can any proceeding for the prosecution or punishment thereof be stayed upon a compromise, except as provided in ORS 135.”
State v. Roberts, 374 Or. 821 (Or. 2026). · cites it 2× “703 - ORS 135.709 (civil compromises); ORS 135.”
State v. Johnsen, 945 P.2d 1064 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). “” ORS 135.709 provides: “No crime can be compromised nor can any proceeding for the prosecution or punishment thereof be stayed upon a compromise, except as provided in ORS 135.”
State v. Fitterer, 820 P.2d 841 (Or. Ct. App. 1991). “703 to ORS 135.709, is not covered by the definition, and neither is sexual abuse.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.