Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 135.845 (2026)

Time of disclosure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      135.845 Time of disclosure. (1) The obligations to disclose shall be performed as soon as practicable following the filing of an indictment or information in the circuit court or the filing of a complaint or information charging a misdemeanor or violation of a city ordinance. The court may supervise the exercise of discovery to the extent necessary to insure that it proceeds properly and expeditiously.

      (2) If, after complying with the provisions of ORS 135.805 to 135.873 and 135.970, a party finds, either before or during trial, additional material or information which is subject to or covered by these provisions, the party must promptly notify the other party of the additional material or information. [1973 c.836 §217; 1999 c.304 §4]

 

      135.850 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §163; renumbered 135.365]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 48 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: State v. Hartfield, 624 P.2d 588 (Or. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Hartfield, 624 P.2d 588 (Or. 1981). · cites it 6× “Their proposal was enacted without change as ORS 135.845: "(1) The obligations to disclose shall be performed as soon as practicable following the filing of an indictment or information in the circuit court or the filing of a complaint charging a misdemeanor or violation of a…”
State v. Eckert, 185 P.3d 564 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 5× “The relevant statutes require the state to disclose “[a]ny written or recorded statements or memoranda of any oral statements made by the defendant” that are “within the possession or control of the district attorney,” and to do so “as soon as practicable.”
State v. White, 154 P.3d 124 (Or. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 4× “See ORS 135.845(2). The trial court denied defendant’s acquittal motion and allowed the state’s witness to testify.”
State v. Wyatt, 15 P.3d 22 (Or. 2000). “” *340 ORS 135.845 provides, in part: “(1) The obligations to disclose shall be performed as soon as practicable following the filing of an indictment or information in the circuit court[.”
State v. Johnson, 554 P.2d 624 (Or. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 4× “Considering first the time aspect of the state's argument, we point out that ORS 135.845 states that the "obligations to disclose shall be performed " after the issuance of the indictment.”
State v. Pilon, 516 P.3d 1181 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “ORS 135.845 provides that “[t]he obli- gations to disclose shall be performed as soon as practica- ble following the filing of an indictment or information in the circuit court or the filing of a complaint or information charging a misdemeanor or violation of a city ordinance.”
State v. Koennecke, 545 P.2d 127 (Or. 1976). · cites it 2× “2d 582 , (1970), and ORS 135.845. As also previously stated, the majority opinion held that "defendant had a right under appropriate circumstances to have his own qualified expert make such examination of the * * * guns * * * as was reasonably necessary to ascertain facts…”
State v. Wolfe, 542 P.2d 482 (Or. 1975). · cites it 5× “" ORS 135.845 provides: "(1) The obligations to disclose shall be performed as soon as practicable following the filing of an indictment or information in the circuit court or the filing of a complaint charging a misdemeanor or violation of a city ordinance.”
State v. Mai, 656 P.2d 315 (Or. 1982). · cites it 2× “However, the legislature, in requiring the prosecution to make discovery under ORS 135.845, exacted a quid pro quo — discovery from the defendant under ORS 135.”
Wyatt v. Czerniak, 195 P.3d 912 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 3× “We recount in detail below the circumstances of those convictions, as pertinent to petitioner’s claims of post-conviction relief.”
State v. Burdge, 664 P.2d 1076 (Or. 1983). · cites it 2× “ORS 135.845(2) provides that if a party finds ‘either before or during trial additional material or information, which is subject to or covered by these provisions, he must promptly notify the other party of the additional material or information.”
State v. Young, 767 P.2d 90 (Or. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 4× “835; ORS 135.845; ORS 135.865. 1 We affirm. Five days before the trial began, defense counsel gave the state a list of witnesses.”
Show all 48 citing cases →
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 135.845(1) — 12 cases
State v. Johnson, 554 P.2d 624 (Or. Ct. App. 1976). “Considering first the time aspect of the state's argument, we point out that ORS 135.845 states that the "obligations to disclose shall be performed " after the issuance of the indictment.”
State v. Wesley, 533 P.3d 786 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
State v. Dyson, 636 P.2d 961 (Or. 1981).
State v. Eckert, 185 P.3d 564 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). “The relevant statutes require the state to disclose “[a]ny written or recorded statements or memoranda of any oral statements made by the defendant” that are “within the possession or control of the district attorney,” and to do so “as soon as practicable.”
State v. Nistler, 342 P.3d 1035 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 135.845(2) — 15 cases
State v. Hartfield, 624 P.2d 588 (Or. 1981). “Their proposal was enacted without change as ORS 135.845: "(1) The obligations to disclose shall be performed as soon as practicable following the filing of an indictment or information in the circuit court or the filing of a complaint charging a misdemeanor or violation of a…”
State v. White, 154 P.3d 124 (Or. Ct. App. 2007). “See ORS 135.845(2). The trial court denied defendant’s acquittal motion and allowed the state’s witness to testify.”
State v. Eckert, 185 P.3d 564 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). “The relevant statutes require the state to disclose “[a]ny written or recorded statements or memoranda of any oral statements made by the defendant” that are “within the possession or control of the district attorney,” and to do so “as soon as practicable.”
State v. Burdge, 664 P.2d 1076 (Or. 1983). “ORS 135.845(2) provides that if a party finds ‘either before or during trial additional material or information, which is subject to or covered by these provisions, he must promptly notify the other party of the additional material or information.”
State v. Wolfe, 542 P.2d 482 (Or. 1975). “" ORS 135.845 provides: "(1) The obligations to disclose shall be performed as soon as practicable following the filing of an indictment or information in the circuit court or the filing of a complaint charging a misdemeanor or violation of a city ordinance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.