137.390
Commencement, term and termination of term of imprisonment in county jail;
treatment of prisoners therein.
The commencement, term and termination of a sentence of imprisonment in the
county jail is to be ascertained by the rule prescribed in ORS 137.370, and the
manner of such confinement and the treatment of persons so sentenced shall be
governed by whatever law may be in force prescribing the discipline of county
jails. [Amended by 1973 c.631 §3]
137.400 [Amended by 1953 c.104 §2; 1955
c.662 §6; repealed by 1967 c.372 §13]
137.410 [Repealed by 1967 c.372 §13]
137.420 [Repealed by 1967 c.372 §13]
137.430 [Repealed by 1967 c.372 §13]
Notes of Decisions
Holcomb v. Sunderland, 894 P.2d 457 (Or. 1995).
· cites it 3× “” ORS 137.390 provided: “The commencement, term and termination of a sentence of imprisonment in the county jail is to be ascertained by the rule prescribed in ORS 137.”
State v. Frier, 333 P.3d 1093 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).
“We note that several other statutes also refer to “imprisonment” in jail.”
State v. McClure, 670 P.2d 1009 (Or. 1983).
“” Defendant also relies on ORS 137.390: “The commencement, term and termination of a sentence of imprisonment in the county jail is to be ascertained by the rule prescribed in ORS 137.”
State v. Perry, 914 P.2d 29 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).
“6 See also ORS 137.390 (providing that the commencement, term and termination of a sentence of imprisonment in the county jail is to be ascertained by the rules prescribed in ORS 137.”
State v. Rudy, 603 P.2d 1230 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).
“ORS 137.390 provides that "[t]he commencement, term and termination of a sentence of imprisonment in the county jail is to be ascertained by the rule prescribed in ORS 137.”
State v. Elksnis, 504 P.2d 1070 (Or. Ct. App. 1973).
“ORS 137.390 provides: “The commencement and termination of a sentence of imprisonment in the county jail is to be ascertained by the rule prescribed in ORS 137.”
State v. Barber, 832 P.2d 51 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
“370; ORS 137.390; State v. McClure, 295 Or 732, 735 , 670 P2d 1009 (1983).”
Fergelic v. Cupp, 631 P.2d 800 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
“370 * * * ” ORS 137.390; see also, ORS 137.330. The effect of these provisions on the petitioner is not before us.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.