Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 137.450 (2026)
Enforcement of money judgment in criminal action
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
137.450 Enforcement of money judgment in criminal action. A judgment against the defendant or complainant in a criminal action, so far as it requires the payment of a fine, fee, assessment, costs and disbursements of the action or restitution, may be enforced as a judgment in a civil action. [Amended by 1973 c.836 §269; 1987 c.709 §1]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1973–1999 · leading case: State v. Fuller, 504 P.2d 1393 (Or. Ct. App. 1973).
State v. Fuller, 504 P.2d 1393 (Or. Ct. App. 1973). “180; [2] ORS 137.450; [3] ORS 161.685(6). Alternatively, ORS 161.”
State v. Barkley, 846 P.2d 390 (Or. 1993). “540(10) (1975), “ ‘restitution’ [means] the return of a sum of money, an object, or the value of an object which a defendant wrongfully obtained in the course of committing the crime.”
State v. Gile, 985 P.2d 199 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). “) ORS 137.450 provides that judgments against a defendant in a criminal action requiring the payment of fines, assessments and costs may be enforced as a judgment in a civil action.”
Wilkins v. Frink, 971 P.2d 494 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). “ORS 137.450 provides that a judgment in a criminal action that requires payment of a fine “may be enforced as a judgment in a civil action.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 137.450(10) — 1 case
State v. Barkley, 846 P.2d 390 (Or. 1993). “540(10) (1975), “ ‘restitution’ [means] the return of a sum of money, an object, or the value of an object which a defendant wrongfully obtained in the course of committing the crime.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.