Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 138.030 (2026)

Parties designated “appellant” and “respondent”; title of action

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      138.030 Parties designated “appellant” and “respondent”; title of action. The party appealing is known as the appellant and the adverse party as the respondent; but the title of the action is not changed in consequence of the appeal.

 

(Appealable Judgments and Orders)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1976–1986 · leading case: Byrd v. Stringer, 666 P.2d 1332 (Or. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Byrd v. Stringer, 666 P.2d 1332 (Or. 1983). · cites it 4× “In order to erect a dwelling on agricultural land in that zone Polk County’s acknowledged ordinances require an applicant to demonstrate that the dwelling either (1) is permitted outright pursuant to county ordinance sections 138.030(a) and 136.020, that is, is a dwelling in…”
State v. Koennecke, 545 P.2d 127 (Or. 1976). · cites it 2× “2d 240, 242 (1975), and rejected by it, holding that: "Defendant's narrow interpretation of ORS 138.030(3) — founded on a distinction between `pretrial motions' and mere `preliminary objections' — is unwarranted.”
1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 714 P.2d 252 (Or. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “” Section 138.030, the F/F provision, states: “Within the F/F Zone no building, structure, or land shall be used, and no building or structure shall be erected, structurally altered, enlarged, or maintained except for any use permitted outright in the exclusive farm use zone…”
State v. Pfortmiller, 632 P.2d 459 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). “Hoare, 20 Or App 439, 444-445 , 532 P2d 240 (1975), we stated: "Defendant’s narrow interpretation of ORS 138.030(3) — founded on a distinction between 'pretrial motions’ and mere 'preliminary objections’ — is unwarranted.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 138.030(3) — 2 cases
State v. Koennecke, 545 P.2d 127 (Or. 1976). “2d 240, 242 (1975), and rejected by it, holding that: "Defendant's narrow interpretation of ORS 138.030(3) — founded on a distinction between `pretrial motions' and mere `preliminary objections' — is unwarranted.”
State v. Pfortmiller, 632 P.2d 459 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). “Hoare, 20 Or App 439, 444-445 , 532 P2d 240 (1975), we stated: "Defendant’s narrow interpretation of ORS 138.030(3) — founded on a distinction between 'pretrial motions’ and mere 'preliminary objections’ — is unwarranted.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 138.030(a) — 1 case
Byrd v. Stringer, 666 P.2d 1332 (Or. 1983). “In order to erect a dwelling on agricultural land in that zone Polk County’s acknowledged ordinances require an applicant to demonstrate that the dwelling either (1) is permitted outright pursuant to county ordinance sections 138.030(a) and 136.020, that is, is a dwelling in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.