Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 138.310 (2026)

Notice to court below when executive director of Oregon Public Defense Commission certifies costs, expenses or compensation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      138.310 Notice to court below when executive director of Oregon Public Defense Commission certifies costs, expenses or compensation. When the executive director of the Oregon Public Defense Commission pays costs, expenses or compensation under ORS 138.500 (5) on appeal in a criminal action, the executive director shall notify the court below of the costs, expenses and compensation paid in order that the court below may exercise its discretion under ORS 151.505 or 161.665 (2). [1983 c.763 §14; 1989 c.1053 §10; 1991 c.790 §16; 1997 c.761 §11; 2001 c.962 §69; 2007 c.291 §2; 2023 c.281 §28]

 

      138.410 [Formerly 138.810; repealed by 1967 c.372 §13]

 

      138.420 [Formerly 138.820; repealed by 1967 c.372 §13]

 

      138.430 [Formerly 138.830: repealed by 1967 c.372 §13]

 

      138.440 [Formerly 138.840; 1961 c.480 §1; repealed by 1967 c.372 §13]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2013 · leading case: Smith v. Two Rivers Corr. Inst., 312 P.3d 568 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).
Smith v. Two Rivers Corr. Inst., 312 P.3d 568 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “310(9)(f) for rules of conduct that will not result in the disciplinary sanctions or procedures specified in ORS 138.310(9)(f)(A) to (C). To the contrary, he asserts that, by their terms in context and in practice, violation of the guidelines can — and does — result in placement…”
State v. Branstetter, 1 P.3d 451 (Or. Ct. App. 2000). “010 to ORS 138.310 that would allow an acquitted defendant to appeal.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 138.310(9)(f)(A) — 1 case
Smith v. Two Rivers Corr. Inst., 312 P.3d 568 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “310(9)(f) for rules of conduct that will not result in the disciplinary sanctions or procedures specified in ORS 138.310(9)(f)(A) to (C). To the contrary, he asserts that, by their terms in context and in practice, violation of the guidelines can — and does — result in placement…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.