Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 144.346 (2026)
Parole revocation sanctions; rules
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
144.346 Parole revocation sanctions; rules. The State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision shall adopt rules to establish parole revocation sanctions for parole violations committed on or after November 1, 1989. [1989 c.790 §18b; 1997 c.525 §9]
Note: 144.346 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 144 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1996–2001 · leading case: Kessler v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 931 P.2d 801 (Or. Ct. App. 1997).
Kessler v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 931 P.2d 801 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). “The issue is whether ORS 144.346 prohibits the Board from ordering petitioner to serve more than six months in prison for a parole violation.”
Woolstrum v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 918 P.2d 112 (Or. Ct. App. 1996). “1 He argues that it is clear from ORS 144.346 and ORS 144.343(7) that the legislature intended that parole violators be subject to the interim sanctions provided by sentencing guidelines.”
Troiano v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 925 P.2d 167 (Or. Ct. App. 1996). “He contends that the Board followed OAR 255-75-096, which, he asserts, contravenes ORS 144.346(2). 1 However, petitioner never raised that issue below.”
Mageske v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 21 P.3d 150 (Or. Ct. App. 2001). “ve that a violation of one or more of the conditions of parole has occurred, the hearing shall proceed to receive evidence from which the board may determine whether to reinstate or continue the alleged parole violator on parole subject to the same or modified conditions of…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 144.346(2) — 2 cases
Kessler v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 931 P.2d 801 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). “The issue is whether ORS 144.346 prohibits the Board from ordering petitioner to serve more than six months in prison for a parole violation.”
Troiano v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 925 P.2d 167 (Or. Ct. App. 1996). “He contends that the Board followed OAR 255-75-096, which, he asserts, contravenes ORS 144.346(2). 1 However, petitioner never raised that issue below.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.