Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.460

Renunciation as defense to conspiracy

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      161.460 Renunciation as defense to conspiracy. (1) It is a defense to a charge of conspiracy that the actor, after conspiring to commit a crime, thwarted commission of the crime which was the object of the conspiracy, under circumstances manifesting a complete and voluntary renunciation of the criminal purpose of the actor. Renunciation by one conspirator does not, however, affect the liability of another conspirator who does not join in the renunciation of the conspiratorial objective.

      (2) The defense of renunciation is an affirmative defense. [1971 c.743 §61]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1992–2010 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Nee
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commonwealth v. Nee (2010) mass “2010); Or. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 161.460 (West 2003); 18 Pa.”
State v. Vasquez-Rubio (1995) orctapp “440; ORS 161.460; ORS 162.035(1); ORS 162.105; ORS 162.”
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Aragorn (2003) orctapp “ORS 161.460(1) provides a defense of renunciation to the crime of conspiracy when the “actor, after conspiring to commit a crime, thwarted commission of the crime which was the object of the conspiracy, under circumstances manifesting a complete and voluntary renunciation of the…”
State v. Davis (1992) orctapp “ORS 161.460(1) provides, in part: “It is a defense to a charge of conspiracy that the actor, after conspiring to commit a crime, thwarted commission of the crime which was the object of the conspiracy, under circumstances manifesting a complete and voluntary renunciation of the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.460(1) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Aragorn (2003) orctapp “ORS 161.460(1) provides a defense of renunciation to the crime of conspiracy when the “actor, after conspiring to commit a crime, thwarted commission of the crime which was the object of the conspiracy, under circumstances manifesting a complete and voluntary renunciation of the…”
State v. Davis (1992) orctapp “ORS 161.460(1) provides, in part: “It is a defense to a charge of conspiracy that the actor, after conspiring to commit a crime, thwarted commission of the crime which was the object of the conspiracy, under circumstances manifesting a complete and voluntary renunciation of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.