Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.432 (2026)
Online sexual corruption of a child in the second degree
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
163.432 Online sexual corruption of a child in the second degree. (1) A person commits the crime of online sexual corruption of a child in the second degree if the person is 18 years of age or older and:
(a) For the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the person or another person, knowingly uses an online communication to solicit a child to engage in sexual contact or sexually explicit conduct; and
(b) Offers or agrees to physically meet with the child.
(2) Online sexual corruption of a child in the second degree is a Class C felony. [2007 c.876 §2]
Note: See note under 163.431.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2009–2026 · leading case: State v. Street, 505 P.3d 425 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Street, 505 P.3d 425 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “433 and ORS 163.432, defendant’s actions qualified as solicitation of a minor.”
State v. Monger, 472 P.3d 270 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). “427, and one count of online sexual corruption of a child in the second degree, ORS 163.432, and argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and in accepting a nonunanimous jury verdict for second- degree online sexual corruption of a child.”
State v. Meyers, 565 P.3d 463 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “Defendant moved in limine to exclude certain text messages, including: “I’ve tied others up” and (a person commits the crime of first-degree online sexual corruption of a child if they violate ORS 163.432 and “intentionally take[ ] a substantial step toward physically meeting…”
State v. McCullough, 220 P.3d 1182 (Or. 2009). “165(l)(h) (one method of committing assault in the third degree is when a person 18 years or older intentionally or knowingly causes physical injury to someone 10 years or younger); ORS 163.432 (online sexual corruption of a child requires that the actor be 18 years or older);…”
State v. Lewis, 423 P.3d 129 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). “ORS 163.432(1). "Solicit" is statutorily defined as "to invite, request, seduce, lure, entice, persuade, prevail upon, coax, coerce or attempt to do so.”
State v. Yaeger, 517 P.3d 1029 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “At the time, defendant had been released to post-prison supervision (PPS) on a conviction of second-degree online sexual corrup- tion of a child, ORS 163.432, and the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision had designated her a predatory sex offender.”
State v. Quinn-Ward, 341 Or. App. 198 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “Defendant argues that those words “connote affirma- tively seeking out as opposed to being a passive receiver of attention.” 1 ORS 163.433(1) provides: “A person commits the crime of online sexual corruption of a child in the first degree if the person violates ORS 163.”
State v. Meyers, 338 Or. App. 59 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “Defendant moved in limine to exclude certain text messages, including: “I’ve tied others up” and (a person commits the crime of first-degree online sexual corruption of a child if they violate ORS 163.432 and “intentionally take[ ] a substantial step toward physically meeting…”
State v. Yaeger, 492 P.3d 668 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “After serving a prison term for second-degree online sexual corruption of a child, ORS 163.432, defen- dant was released, and the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board) designated her a predatory sex offender.”
State v. Quinn-Ward, 341 Or. App. 198 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “Defendant argues that those words “connote affirma- tively seeking out as opposed to being a passive receiver of attention.” 1 ORS 163.433(1) provides: “A person commits the crime of online sexual corruption of a child in the first degree if the person violates ORS 163.”
State v. Fitzhugh, 350 Or. App. 13 (Or. Ct. App. 2026). “Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for three counts of online sexual corruption of a child in the second degree, ORS 163.432 (Counts 1, 2, and 4), following a stipulated facts trial before the court.”
State v. Williams, 334 Or. App. 173 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “” ORS 163.432(1). For purposes of those statutes, a “child” is “a person who the defendant reasonably believes to be under 16 years of age.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.432(1) — 5 cases
State v. Lewis, 423 P.3d 129 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). “ORS 163.432(1). "Solicit" is statutorily defined as "to invite, request, seduce, lure, entice, persuade, prevail upon, coax, coerce or attempt to do so.”
State v. Meyers, 565 P.3d 463 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “Defendant moved in limine to exclude certain text messages, including: “I’ve tied others up” and (a person commits the crime of first-degree online sexual corruption of a child if they violate ORS 163.432 and “intentionally take[ ] a substantial step toward physically meeting…”
State v. Meyers, 338 Or. App. 59 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “Defendant moved in limine to exclude certain text messages, including: “I’ve tied others up” and (a person commits the crime of first-degree online sexual corruption of a child if they violate ORS 163.432 and “intentionally take[ ] a substantial step toward physically meeting…”
State v. Williams, 334 Or. App. 173 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “” ORS 163.432(1). For purposes of those statutes, a “child” is “a person who the defendant reasonably believes to be under 16 years of age.”
State v. Fitzhugh, 350 Or. App. 13 (Or. Ct. App. 2026). “Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for three counts of online sexual corruption of a child in the second degree, ORS 163.432 (Counts 1, 2, and 4), following a stipulated facts trial before the court.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.432(1)(a) — 1 case
State v. Street, 505 P.3d 425 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “433 and ORS 163.432, defendant’s actions qualified as solicitation of a minor.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.