163A.030
Hearing on issue of reporting by sex offender adjudicated in juvenile court;
right to counsel.
(1)(a) Except as provided in subsection (6) of this section, the juvenile court
shall hold a hearing on the issue of reporting as a sex offender by a person
who has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court under
ORS 419C.005, or found by the juvenile court to be responsible except for
insanity under ORS 419C.411, for having committed an act that if committed by
an adult would constitute a felony sex crime if:
(A) The person
was adjudicated on or after August 12, 2015; or
(B) The person
was adjudicated before August 12, 2015, and was still under the jurisdiction of
the juvenile court or the Psychiatric Security Review Board on April 4, 2016.
(b) Unless the
court continues the hearing described in this section for good cause, the
hearing must be held:
(A) During the
six-month period before the termination of juvenile court jurisdiction over the
person; or
(B) During the
six-month period after the court receives the notice described in subsection
(2) of this section from the Psychiatric Security Review Board, if the person
was placed under the jurisdiction of the board.
(c) The court
shall notify the person of the person’s right to a hearing under this section
upon finding the person within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court under ORS
419C.005.
(2)(a) The county
or state agency responsible for supervising the person shall notify the person
and the juvenile court when the agency determines that termination of
jurisdiction is likely to occur within six months.
(b) If the
Psychiatric Security Review Board discharges a person prior to the end of the
board’s jurisdiction over the person, the board shall notify the juvenile court
within three business days after the discharge date.
(3) Upon receipt
of the notice described in subsection (2) of this section, the court shall:
(a) Appoint an
attorney for the person as described in subsection (4) of this section;
(b) Set an
initial hearing date; and
(c) Notify the
parties and the juvenile department or the Psychiatric Security Review Board,
if the department or board is supervising or has jurisdiction over the person,
of the hearing at least 60 days before the hearing date.
(4)(a) A person
who is the subject of a hearing under this section has the right to be
represented by a suitable attorney possessing skills and experience
commensurate with the nature and complexity of the case, to consult with the
attorney prior to the hearing and to have a suitable attorney appointed at
state expense.
(b) In order to
comply with the right to counsel under paragraph (a) of this subsection, the
court may:
(A) Continue the
appointment of the attorney appointed under ORS 419C.200 at the time of
disposition;
(B) Set a date
prior to the hearing under this section in order to reappoint the attorney
appointed under ORS 419C.200; or
(C) Appoint or
reappoint an attorney at any time in response to a request by the person who is
the subject of a hearing under this section.
(5)(a) The
district attorney shall notify the victim prior to the hearing of the right to
appear and the right to be heard under ORS 419C.273.
(b) If the person
is under the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board, the board
shall notify the following of the hearing:
(A) The mental
health agency providing services to the person, if any;
(B) The person’s
board defense attorney; and
(C) The assistant
attorney general representing the state at board hearings.
(6)(a) A person
may waive the right to the hearing described in this section only after
receiving the notice described in subsection (2)(a) of this section and after
consultation with the person’s attorney. If the court finds that the person has
knowingly waived the right to a hearing, the court shall enter an order
requiring the person to report as a sex offender under ORS 163A.025.
(b) If a person
fails to appear at a hearing described in this section, the court may enter an
order requiring the person to report as a sex offender under ORS 163A.025.
(7) At the
hearing described in subsection (1) of this section:
(a) The district
attorney, the victim, the person and the juvenile department or a
representative of the Oregon Youth Authority shall have an opportunity to be
heard.
(b) The person
who is the subject of the hearing has the burden of proving by clear and
convincing evidence that the person is rehabilitated and does not pose a threat
to the safety of the public. If the court finds that the person has not met the
burden of proof, the court shall enter an order requiring the person to report
as a sex offender under ORS 163A.025.
(8) In
determining whether the person has met the burden of proof, the juvenile court
may consider but need not be limited to considering:
(a) The extent
and impact of any physical or emotional injury to the victim;
(b) The nature of
the act that subjected the person to the duty of reporting as a sex offender;
(c) Whether the
person used or threatened to use force in committing the act;
(d) Whether the
act was premeditated;
(e) Whether the
person took advantage of a position of authority or trust in committing the
act;
(f) The age of
any victim at the time of the act, the age difference between any victim and
the person and the number of victims;
(g) The
vulnerability of the victim;
(h) Other acts
committed by the person that would be crimes if committed by an adult and
criminal activities engaged in by the person before and after the adjudication;
(i) Statements,
documents and recommendations by or on behalf of the victim or the parents of
the victim;
(j) The person’s
willingness to accept personal responsibility for the act and personal
accountability for the consequences of the act;
(k) The person’s
ability and efforts to pay the victim’s expenses for counseling and other
trauma-related expenses or other efforts to mitigate the effects of the act;
(L) Whether the
person has participated in and satisfactorily completed a sex offender
treatment program or any other intervention, and if so the juvenile court may
also consider:
(A) The
availability, duration and extent of the treatment activities;
(B) Reports and
recommendations from the providers of the treatment;
(C) The person’s
compliance with court, board or supervision requirements regarding treatment;
and
(D) The quality
and thoroughness of the treatment program;
(m) The person’s
academic and employment history;
(n) The person’s
use of drugs or alcohol before and after the adjudication;
(o) The person’s
history of public or private indecency;
(p) The person’s
compliance with and success in completing the terms of supervision;
(q) The results
of psychological examinations of the person;
(r) The
protection afforded the public by records of sex offender registration; and
(s) Any other
relevant factors.
(9) In a hearing
under this section, the juvenile court may receive testimony, reports and other
evidence, without regard to whether the evidence is admissible under ORS 40.010
to 40.210 and 40.310 to 40.585, if the evidence is relevant evidence related to
the determination and findings required under this section. As used in this
subsection, “relevant evidence” has the meaning given that term in ORS 40.150.
(10)(a) In a
hearing under this section, the Oregon Youth Authority or the juvenile
department, if either agency is supervising the person, or the Psychiatric
Security Review Board, if the board has jurisdiction over the person, shall
file with the juvenile court the following records and materials in the
possession of the agency or board at least 45 days prior to the hearing unless
good cause is shown:
(A) Evaluations
and treatment records concerning the person conducted by a clinician or program
operating under the standards of practice for the evaluation and treatment of
juvenile sex offenders adopted by the Sexual Offense Treatment Board under ORS
675.400, and recommendations contained therein regarding the need for the
person to register in order to protect the public from future sex crimes;
(B) All
examination preparation material and examination records from polygraph
examinations conducted by or for the treatment provider, juvenile department or
Oregon Youth Authority; and
(C) The
Psychiatric Security Review Board exhibit file.
(b) Any records
and materials filed with the court under this subsection shall be made
available to the parties in accordance with ORS 419A.255.
(11)(a) When the
juvenile court enters an order described in subsection (6)(a) or (7)(b) of this
section, the court shall ensure that the person completes a form that documents
the person’s obligation to report under ORS 163A.025. No later than three
business days after the person completes the form required by this subsection,
the court shall ensure that the form is sent to the Department of State Police.
(b) If the court
enters an order under this section, no later than three business days after
entry of the order, the court shall ensure that the order is sent to the
Department of State Police.
(12)
Notwithstanding ORS 419C.005 (4)(c), (d) and (e), the juvenile court retains
jurisdiction over a person for purposes of this section.
(13) As used in
this section, “parties” means the person, the state as represented by the
district attorney or the juvenile department, and the Oregon Youth Authority or
other child care agency, if the person is temporarily committed to the
authority or agency. [2015 c.820 §31; 2016 c.95 §2; 2019 c.68 §13; 2019 c.430 §17;
2021 c.597 §33]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
25
cases (
22 in the last 5 years), 2020–2026 · leading case:
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
· cites it 63× “030, which applies when a person has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that would constitute a felony sex crime if committed by an adult and which specifies a process that a juvenile court must follow before ordering the…”
State v. W. V., 342 Or. App. 250 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 70× “Instead, it per- mits the juvenile court to “retain[ ] jurisdiction over a per- son for purposes of this section,” which indicates that the legislature intended juvenile courts to follow the remainder of ORS 163A.030 in conducting reporting hearings that are held under…”
State v. A. L. M., 469 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 22× “” The juvenile court denied youth’s request after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, youth argues that the record does not support the juvenile court’s decision.”
State v. A. R. H., 499 P.3d 851 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
· cites it 24× “As the end of his pro- bationary term approached, youth requested to be relieved of the obligation to report as a sex offender pursuant to ORS 163A.030. The juvenile court denied youth’s request, deter- mining that youth had “not proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that he…”
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 22× “That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 27× “ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
State v. B. J. P., 339 Or. App. 134 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 20× “030(9), the statutory hearing is designed to allow the juvenile court to “receive testimony, reports and other evi- dence, without regard to whether the evidence is admissible under” the rules of evidence if it is “related to the determi- nation and findings required under” ORS…”
State v. J. J. L., 323 Or. App. 136 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 9× “Over the six years following J’s admission, J engaged in sex-offender treatment, took responsibility for his con- duct, matured, improved his self-control, and, most impor- tantly, did not reoffend.”
State v. D. M. C., 345 Or. App. 81 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 9× “It then issued a written order stating: “The court received sworn testimony from [youth] and from the victim [S], it received documents in evidence and also heard closing arguments from counsel.”
State v. K. L. F., 456 P.3d 376 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 4× “In youth’s view, the court failed to conduct the requisite hear- ing under ORS 163A.030, which requires a juvenile court to hold a hearing on the issue of reporting as a sex offender during the six-month period before terminating juvenile court jurisdiction.”
State v. Gardner-Rolph, 345 Or. App. 681 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“Defendant, for his part, argued that a prison sentence would be “unjust and unconstitutional under Article I, section 16 of the Oregon Constitution and the Eighth Amendment to the United State Constitution” and that the court should “should impose a probationary sentence and…”
State v. A. R. B., 346 Or. App. 624 (Or. Ct. App. 2026).
· cites it 19× “Under ORS 163A.030, when a youth has been adjudicated for conduct that would constitute a felony sex crime if commit- ted by an adult, the juvenile court is to hold a hearing on the issue of sex-offender reporting in the six months before the termination of juvenile court…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(1) — 10 cases
State v. W. V., 342 Or. App. 250 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“Instead, it per- mits the juvenile court to “retain[ ] jurisdiction over a per- son for purposes of this section,” which indicates that the legislature intended juvenile courts to follow the remainder of ORS 163A.030 in conducting reporting hearings that are held under…”
State v. A. L. M., 469 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
“” The juvenile court denied youth’s request after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, youth argues that the record does not support the juvenile court’s decision.”
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
State v. K. L. F., 456 P.3d 376 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
“In youth’s view, the court failed to conduct the requisite hear- ing under ORS 163A.030, which requires a juvenile court to hold a hearing on the issue of reporting as a sex offender during the six-month period before terminating juvenile court jurisdiction.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(1)(a) — 6 cases
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
“030, which applies when a person has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that would constitute a felony sex crime if committed by an adult and which specifies a process that a juvenile court must follow before ordering the…”
State v. W. V., 342 Or. App. 250 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“Instead, it per- mits the juvenile court to “retain[ ] jurisdiction over a per- son for purposes of this section,” which indicates that the legislature intended juvenile courts to follow the remainder of ORS 163A.030 in conducting reporting hearings that are held under…”
State v. A. L. M., 469 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
“” The juvenile court denied youth’s request after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, youth argues that the record does not support the juvenile court’s decision.”
State v. A. R. H., 499 P.3d 851 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
“As the end of his pro- bationary term approached, youth requested to be relieved of the obligation to report as a sex offender pursuant to ORS 163A.030. The juvenile court denied youth’s request, deter- mining that youth had “not proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that he…”
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(1)(b) — 1 case
State v. W. V., 342 Or. App. 250 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“Instead, it per- mits the juvenile court to “retain[ ] jurisdiction over a per- son for purposes of this section,” which indicates that the legislature intended juvenile courts to follow the remainder of ORS 163A.030 in conducting reporting hearings that are held under…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(1)(b)(A) — 4 cases
State v. W. V., 342 Or. App. 250 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“Instead, it per- mits the juvenile court to “retain[ ] jurisdiction over a per- son for purposes of this section,” which indicates that the legislature intended juvenile courts to follow the remainder of ORS 163A.030 in conducting reporting hearings that are held under…”
State v. A. L. M., 469 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
“” The juvenile court denied youth’s request after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, youth argues that the record does not support the juvenile court’s decision.”
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
State v. A. R. B., 346 Or. App. 624 (Or. Ct. App. 2026).
“Under ORS 163A.030, when a youth has been adjudicated for conduct that would constitute a felony sex crime if commit- ted by an adult, the juvenile court is to hold a hearing on the issue of sex-offender reporting in the six months before the termination of juvenile court…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(10)(a) — 1 case
State v. A. R. B., 346 Or. App. 624 (Or. Ct. App. 2026).
“Under ORS 163A.030, when a youth has been adjudicated for conduct that would constitute a felony sex crime if commit- ted by an adult, the juvenile court is to hold a hearing on the issue of sex-offender reporting in the six months before the termination of juvenile court…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(10)(a)(A) — 3 cases
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
“030, which applies when a person has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that would constitute a felony sex crime if committed by an adult and which specifies a process that a juvenile court must follow before ordering the…”
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(10)(a)(B) — 1 case
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(12) — 2 cases
State v. W. V., 342 Or. App. 250 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“Instead, it per- mits the juvenile court to “retain[ ] jurisdiction over a per- son for purposes of this section,” which indicates that the legislature intended juvenile courts to follow the remainder of ORS 163A.030 in conducting reporting hearings that are held under…”
State v. K. L. F., 456 P.3d 376 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
“In youth’s view, the court failed to conduct the requisite hear- ing under ORS 163A.030, which requires a juvenile court to hold a hearing on the issue of reporting as a sex offender during the six-month period before terminating juvenile court jurisdiction.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(2)(a) — 1 case
State v. W. V., 342 Or. App. 250 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“Instead, it per- mits the juvenile court to “retain[ ] jurisdiction over a per- son for purposes of this section,” which indicates that the legislature intended juvenile courts to follow the remainder of ORS 163A.030 in conducting reporting hearings that are held under…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(3)(b) — 1 case
State v. W. V., 342 Or. App. 250 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“Instead, it per- mits the juvenile court to “retain[ ] jurisdiction over a per- son for purposes of this section,” which indicates that the legislature intended juvenile courts to follow the remainder of ORS 163A.030 in conducting reporting hearings that are held under…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(3)(c) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(4)(a) — 1 case
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
“030, which applies when a person has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that would constitute a felony sex crime if committed by an adult and which specifies a process that a juvenile court must follow before ordering the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(6)(b) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(7) — 4 cases
State v. A. L. M., 469 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
“” The juvenile court denied youth’s request after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, youth argues that the record does not support the juvenile court’s decision.”
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
State v. W. V., 342 Or. App. 250 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“Instead, it per- mits the juvenile court to “retain[ ] jurisdiction over a per- son for purposes of this section,” which indicates that the legislature intended juvenile courts to follow the remainder of ORS 163A.030 in conducting reporting hearings that are held under…”
State v. A. R. B., 346 Or. App. 624 (Or. Ct. App. 2026).
“Under ORS 163A.030, when a youth has been adjudicated for conduct that would constitute a felony sex crime if commit- ted by an adult, the juvenile court is to hold a hearing on the issue of sex-offender reporting in the six months before the termination of juvenile court…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(7)(b) — 17 cases
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
“030, which applies when a person has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that would constitute a felony sex crime if committed by an adult and which specifies a process that a juvenile court must follow before ordering the…”
State v. A. R. H., 499 P.3d 851 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
“As the end of his pro- bationary term approached, youth requested to be relieved of the obligation to report as a sex offender pursuant to ORS 163A.030. The juvenile court denied youth’s request, deter- mining that youth had “not proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that he…”
State v. A. L. M., 469 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
“” The juvenile court denied youth’s request after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, youth argues that the record does not support the juvenile court’s decision.”
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8) — 10 cases
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
“030, which applies when a person has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that would constitute a felony sex crime if committed by an adult and which specifies a process that a juvenile court must follow before ordering the…”
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
State v. A. L. M., 469 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
“” The juvenile court denied youth’s request after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, youth argues that the record does not support the juvenile court’s decision.”
State v. A. R. H., 499 P.3d 851 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
“As the end of his pro- bationary term approached, youth requested to be relieved of the obligation to report as a sex offender pursuant to ORS 163A.030. The juvenile court denied youth’s request, deter- mining that youth had “not proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that he…”
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(L) — 3 cases
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
“030, which applies when a person has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that would constitute a felony sex crime if committed by an adult and which specifies a process that a juvenile court must follow before ordering the…”
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(L)(A) — 1 case
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(a) — 6 cases
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
“030, which applies when a person has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that would constitute a felony sex crime if committed by an adult and which specifies a process that a juvenile court must follow before ordering the…”
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
State v. D. M. C., 345 Or. App. 81 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“It then issued a written order stating: “The court received sworn testimony from [youth] and from the victim [S], it received documents in evidence and also heard closing arguments from counsel.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(b) — 1 case
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(d) — 1 case
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(g) — 1 case
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(h) — 2 cases
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
“030, which applies when a person has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that would constitute a felony sex crime if committed by an adult and which specifies a process that a juvenile court must follow before ordering the…”
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(i) — 1 case
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
“030, which applies when a person has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that would constitute a felony sex crime if committed by an adult and which specifies a process that a juvenile court must follow before ordering the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(j) — 3 cases
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
“030, which applies when a person has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that would constitute a felony sex crime if committed by an adult and which specifies a process that a juvenile court must follow before ordering the…”
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(m) — 1 case
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(n) — 1 case
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(o) — 1 case
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(p) — 2 cases
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(q) — 1 case
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(8)(s) — 5 cases
State v. A. R. H., 530 P.3d 897 (Or. 2023).
“030, which applies when a person has been found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that would constitute a felony sex crime if committed by an adult and which specifies a process that a juvenile court must follow before ordering the…”
State v. A. L. M., 469 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
“” The juvenile court denied youth’s request after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, youth argues that the record does not support the juvenile court’s decision.”
State v. X. E. W., 546 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“That decision emphasizes five important aspects of the meaning and application of ORS 163A.030, which inform our review of this case.”
State v. K. L. F., 552 P.3d 722 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“ORS 163A.030 (8)(j), (L)(A). In the letter, youth acknowledged the pain he caused the victim, acknowledged that his conduct was a “terrible decision,” and acknowledged that youth’s lying about the incident early on caused additional pain for the victim.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.030(9) — 1 case
State v. B. J. P., 339 Or. App. 134 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“030(9), the statutory hearing is designed to allow the juvenile court to “receive testimony, reports and other evi- dence, without regard to whether the evidence is admissible under” the rules of evidence if it is “related to the determi- nation and findings required under” ORS…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.