Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.370 (2026)

Possession of firearm or dangerous weapon in public building or court facility; exceptions; discharging firearm at school

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      166.370 Possession of firearm or dangerous weapon in public building or court facility; exceptions; discharging firearm at school. (1)(a) Any person who intentionally possesses a loaded or unloaded firearm or any other instrument used as a dangerous weapon, while in or on a public building, shall upon conviction be guilty of a Class C felony.

      (b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this subsection, in a prosecution under this section for the possession of a firearm within the Capitol, within the passenger terminal of a commercial service airport with over one million passenger boardings per year, within a building subject to a policy described in ORS 166.377 (3) or on school grounds subject to a policy described in ORS 166.377 (1), if the person proves by a preponderance of the evidence that, at the time of the possession, the person was licensed under ORS 166.291 and 166.292 to carry a concealed handgun, upon conviction the person is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

      (2)(a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, a person who intentionally possesses:

      (A) A firearm in a court facility is guilty, upon conviction, of a Class C felony. A person who intentionally possesses a firearm in a court facility shall surrender the firearm to a law enforcement officer.

      (B) A weapon, other than a firearm, in a court facility may be required to surrender the weapon to a law enforcement officer or to immediately remove it from the court facility. A person who fails to comply with this subparagraph is guilty, upon conviction, of a Class C felony.

      (C) A firearm in a local court facility is guilty, upon conviction, of a Class C felony if, prior to the offense, the presiding judge of the local court facility entered an order prohibiting firearms in the area in which the court conducts business and during the hours in which the court operates.

      (b) The presiding judge of a judicial district or a municipal court may enter an order permitting the possession of specified weapons in a court facility.

      (c) Within a shared court facility, the presiding judge of a municipal court or justice of the peace district may not enter an order concerning the possession of weapons in the court facility that is in conflict with an order entered by the presiding judge of the circuit court.

      (3) Subsection (1)(a) of this section does not apply to:

      (a) A police officer or reserve officer, as those terms are defined in ORS 181A.355.

      (b) A parole and probation officer, as defined in ORS 181A.355, while the parole and probation officer is acting within the scope of employment.

      (c) A federal officer, as defined in ORS 133.005, or a certified reserve officer or corrections officer, as those terms are defined in ORS 181A.355, while the federal officer, certified reserve officer or corrections officer is acting within the scope of employment.

      (d) A person summoned by an officer described in paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of this subsection to assist in making an arrest or preserving the peace, while the summoned person is engaged in assisting the officer.

      (e) An honorably retired law enforcement officer.

      (f) An active or reserve member of the military forces of this state or the United States, when engaged in the performance of duty.

      (g) A person who is licensed under ORS 166.291 and 166.292 to carry a concealed handgun, except as provided in subsection (1)(b) of this section.

      (h) A person who is authorized by the officer or agency that controls the public building to possess a firearm or dangerous weapon in that public building.

      (i) An employee of the United States Department of Agriculture, acting within the scope of employment, who possesses a firearm in the course of the lawful taking of wildlife.

      (j) Possession of a firearm on school property if the firearm:

      (A) Is possessed by a person who is not otherwise prohibited from possessing the firearm; and

      (B) Is unloaded and locked in a motor vehicle.

      (k) A person who possesses a firearm in the passenger terminal of a commercial service airport, if the firearm is unloaded and in a locked hard-sided container for the purposes of transporting the firearm as checked baggage in accordance with federal law.

      (4)(a) Except as provided in subsection (1)(b) of this section, the exceptions listed in subsection (3)(d) to (k) of this section constitute affirmative defenses to a charge of violating subsection (1)(a) of this section.

      (b) A person may not use the affirmative defense described in subsection (3)(e) of this section if the person has been convicted of an offense that would make the person ineligible to obtain a concealed handgun license under ORS 166.291 and 166.292.

      (5)(a) Any person who knowingly, or with reckless disregard for the safety of another, discharges or attempts to discharge a firearm at a place that the person knows is a school shall upon conviction be guilty of a Class C felony.

      (b) Paragraph (a) of this subsection does not apply to the discharge of a firearm:

      (A) As part of a program approved by a school in the school by an individual who is participating in the program;

      (B) By a law enforcement officer acting in the officer’s official capacity; or

      (C) By an employee of the United States Department of Agriculture, acting within the scope of employment, in the course of the lawful taking of wildlife.

      (6) Any weapon carried in violation of this section is subject to the forfeiture provisions of ORS 166.279.

      (7) Notwithstanding the fact that a person’s conduct in a single criminal episode constitutes a violation of both subsections (1) and (5) of this section, the district attorney may charge the person with only one of the offenses.

      (8) As used in this section, “dangerous weapon” means a dangerous weapon as that term is defined in ORS 161.015. [1969 c.705 §§2,4; 1977 c.207 §2; 1979 c.398 §2; 1989 c.839 §22; 1989 c.982 §5; 1991 c.67 §39; 1993 c.625 §1; 1999 c.782 §7; 1999 c.1040 §4; 2001 c.666 §§24,36; 2003 c.614 §6; 2009 c.556 §6; 2015 c.351 §2; 2015 c.709 §4; 2021 c.146 §10; 2025 c.594 §3]

 

      166.372 [1993 c.625 §3; repealed by 1996 c.16 §5]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1983–2025 · leading case: State v. Christian, 274 P.3d 262 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Christian, 274 P.3d 262 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 6× “A person authorized to possess a loaded firearm while in or on a public building under ORS 166.370. "5. A government employee authorized or required by his or her employment or office to carry firearms.”
City of Portland v. Jackson, 850 P.2d 1093 (Or. 1993). · cites it 2× “, ORS 166.370(2)(d) (persons with a permit to carry a concealed handgun cannot be prosecuted for possessing a firearm in a public building).”
Doe v. Medford Sch. Dist. 549C, 221 P.3d 787 (Or. Ct. App. 2009). ““(d) A person authorized to possess a loaded firearm while in or on a public building or court facility under ORS 166.370.” (The phrase “or court facility” was added to ORS 166.”
State v. Garcia, 399 P.3d 444 (Or. 2017). · cites it 2× “370, which defines the offenses of possession of a firearm or dangerous weapon in public buildings, provides that “Notwithstanding the fact that a person’s conduct in a single criminal episode constitutes” multiple statutory violations for possession in a public building and in…”
City of Portland v. Sottile, 561 P.3d 1159 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “A person authorized to possess a loaded firearm while in or on a public building under ORS 166.370. “5. A government employee authorized or required by his or her employ- ment or office to carry firearms.”
State v. Christian, 307 P.3d 429 (Or. 2013). “A person authorized to possess a loaded firearm while in or on a public building under ORS 166.370. “5. A government employee authorized or required by his or her employment or office to carry firearms.”
Oregon Firearms Educ. Found. v. Bd. of Higher Educ., 264 P.3d 160 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “Petitioner next contends that the State Board of Higher Education exceeded its authority by enacting OAR *718 580-022-0045(3) because the rule is inconsistent with state law, specifically ORS 166.370, which petitioner contends expressly permits individuals with concealed handgun…”
State v. Dyer, 970 P.2d 249 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Defendant appeals his convictions for possession of a firearm in a public building, ORS 166.370, possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.”
Willis v. Winters, 234 P.3d 141 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “370(3)(d) (prohibition on possession of firearm in public building in ORS 166.370(1) does not apply to “[a] person who is licensed under ORS 166.”
State v. Snow, 268 P.3d 802 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “180 and ORS 166.370 by every lawful necessary means, including searches of an individual’s person and carried item, and seizure of a firearm, knife, device, or hazardous substance capable of inflicting death or physical injury, to prevent any person from entering or being within…”
State v. Chambers, 404 P.3d 1122 (Or. Ct. App. 2017). “38 Smith and Wesson revolver, an expired concealed weapon permit, and some Adderall pills.”
State v. Owenby, 826 P.2d 51 (Or. Ct. App. 1992). “ORS 166.370. Limitation on the right to bear arms is permissible when the unrestricted exercise of the right poses a threat to the public and the means chosen to protect the public does not unreasonably interfere with that right.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.370(1) — 3 cases
Willis v. Winters, 234 P.3d 141 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “370(3)(d) (prohibition on possession of firearm in public building in ORS 166.370(1) does not apply to “[a] person who is licensed under ORS 166.”
Oregon Firearms Educ. Found. v. Bd. of Higher Educ., 264 P.3d 160 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “Petitioner next contends that the State Board of Higher Education exceeded its authority by enacting OAR *718 580-022-0045(3) because the rule is inconsistent with state law, specifically ORS 166.370, which petitioner contends expressly permits individuals with concealed handgun…”
State v. Craigen, 454 P.3d 7 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.370(2)(d) — 1 case
City of Portland v. Jackson, 850 P.2d 1093 (Or. 1993). “, ORS 166.370(2)(d) (persons with a permit to carry a concealed handgun cannot be prosecuted for possessing a firearm in a public building).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.370(3) — 1 case
Oregon Firearms Educ. Found. v. Bd. of Higher Educ., 264 P.3d 160 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “Petitioner next contends that the State Board of Higher Education exceeded its authority by enacting OAR *718 580-022-0045(3) because the rule is inconsistent with state law, specifically ORS 166.370, which petitioner contends expressly permits individuals with concealed handgun…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.370(3)(d) — 1 case
Willis v. Winters, 234 P.3d 141 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “370(3)(d) (prohibition on possession of firearm in public building in ORS 166.370(1) does not apply to “[a] person who is licensed under ORS 166.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.370(7) — 3 cases
State v. Garcia, 399 P.3d 444 (Or. 2017). “370, which defines the offenses of possession of a firearm or dangerous weapon in public buildings, provides that “Notwithstanding the fact that a person’s conduct in a single criminal episode constitutes” multiple statutory violations for possession in a public building and in…”
State v. Garcia (Or. 2017).
State v. Garcia (Or. 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.