Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715 (2026)

Definitions for ORS 166.715 to 166.735

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

166.715 Definitions for ORS 166.715 to 166.735. As used in ORS 166.715 to 166.735, unless the context requires otherwise:

(1) “Documentary material” means any book, paper, document, writing, drawing, graph, chart, photograph, phonograph record, magnetic tape, computer printout, other data compilation from which information can be obtained or from which information can be translated into usable form, or other tangible item.

(2) “Enterprise” includes any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, business trust or other profit or nonprofit legal entity, and includes any union, association or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity, and both illicit and licit enterprises and governmental and nongovernmental entities.

(3) “Investigative agency” means the Department of Justice or any district attorney.

(4) “Pattern of racketeering activity” means engaging in at least two incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics, including a nexus to the same enterprise, and are not isolated incidents, provided at least one of such incidents occurred after November 1, 1981, and that the last of such incidents occurred within five years after a prior incident of racketeering activity. Notwithstanding ORS 131.505 to 131.525 or 419A.190 or any other provision of law providing that a previous prosecution is a bar to a subsequent prosecution, conduct that constitutes an incident of racketeering activity may be used to establish a pattern of racketeering activity without regard to whether the conduct previously has been the subject of a criminal prosecution or conviction or a juvenile court adjudication, unless the prosecution resulted in an acquittal or the adjudication resulted in entry of an order finding the youth not to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court.

(5) “Person” means any individual or entity capable of holding a legal or beneficial interest in real or personal property.

(6) “Racketeering activity” includes conduct of a person committed both before and after the person attains the age of 18 years, and means to commit, to attempt to commit, to conspire to commit, or to solicit, coerce or intimidate another person to commit:

(a) Any conduct that constitutes a crime, as defined in ORS 161.515, under any of the following provisions of the Oregon Revised Statutes:

(A) ORS 59.005 to 59.505, 59.710 to 59.830, 59.991 and 59.995, relating to securities;

(B) ORS 162.015, 162.025 and 162.065 to 162.085, relating to bribery and perjury;

(C) ORS 162.235, 162.265 to 162.305, 162.325, 162.335, 162.355 and 162.365, relating to obstructing governmental administration;

(D) ORS 162.405 to 162.425, relating to abuse of public office;

(E) ORS 162.455, relating to interference with legislative operation;

(F) ORS 163.095 to 163.115, 163.118, 163.125 and 163.145, relating to criminal homicide;

(G) ORS 163.160 to 163.205, relating to assault and related offenses;

(H) ORS 163.225 and 163.235, relating to kidnapping;

(I) ORS 163.275, relating to coercion;

(J) ORS 163.665 to 163.693, relating to sexual conduct of children;

(K) ORS 164.015, 164.043, 164.045, 164.055, 164.057, 164.075 to 164.095, 164.098, 164.125, 164.135, 164.140, 164.215, 164.225 and 164.245 to 164.270, relating to theft, burglary, criminal trespass and related offenses;

(L) ORS 164.315 to 164.335, relating to arson and related offenses;

(M) ORS 164.345 to 164.365, relating to criminal mischief;

(N) ORS 164.395 to 164.415, relating to robbery;

(O) ORS 164.865, 164.875 and 164.868 to 164.872, relating to unlawful recording or labeling of a recording;

(P) ORS 165.007 to 165.022, 165.032 to 165.042 and 165.055 to 165.070, relating to forgery and related offenses;

(Q) ORS 165.080 to 165.109, relating to business and commercial offenses;

(R) ORS 165.540 and 165.555, relating to communication crimes;

(S) ORS 166.180, 166.190, 166.220, 166.250, 166.270, 166.275, 166.410, 166.450 and 166.470, relating to firearms and other weapons;

(T) ORS 164.377 (2) to (4), as punishable under ORS 164.377 (5)(b), 167.007 to 167.017, 167.057, 167.062 to 167.080, 167.090, 167.122 to 167.137, 167.147, 167.164, 167.167, 167.212, 167.355, 167.365, 167.370, 167.428, 167.431 and 167.439, relating to prostitution, obscenity, sexual conduct, gambling, computer crimes involving the Oregon State Lottery, animal fighting, forcible recovery of a fighting bird and related offenses;

(U) ORS 171.990, relating to legislative witnesses;

(V) ORS 260.575 and 260.665, relating to election offenses;

(W) ORS 314.075, relating to income tax;

(X) ORS 180.440 (2) and 180.486 (2) and ORS chapter 323, relating to cigarette and tobacco products taxes and the directories developed under ORS 180.425 and 180.477;

(Y) ORS 411.630, 411.675, 411.690 and 411.840, relating to public assistance payments or medical assistance benefits, and ORS 411.990 (2) and (3);

(Z) ORS 462.140, 462.415 and 462.420 to 462.520, relating to racing;

(AA) ORS 463.995, relating to entertainment wrestling and unarmed combat sports, as defined in ORS 463.015;

(BB) ORS 471.305, 471.360, 471.392 to 471.400, 471.403, 471.404, 471.405, 471.425, 471.442, 471.445, 471.446, 471.485, 471.490 and 471.675, relating to alcoholic liquor, and any of the provisions of ORS chapter 471 relating to licenses issued under the Liquor Control Act;

(CC) ORS 475C.005 to 475C.525, relating to marijuana items as defined in ORS 475C.009;

(DD) ORS 475.005 to 475.285 and 475.752 to 475.980, relating to controlled substances;

(EE) ORS 480.070, 480.210, 480.215, 480.235 and 480.265, relating to explosives;

(FF) ORS 819.010, 819.040, 822.100, 822.135 and 822.150, relating to motor vehicles;

(GG) ORS 658.452 or 658.991 (2) to (4), relating to labor contractors;

(HH) ORS chapter 706, relating to banking law administration;

(II) ORS chapter 714, relating to branch banking;

(JJ) ORS chapter 716, relating to mutual savings banks;

(KK) ORS chapter 723, relating to credit unions;

(LL) ORS chapter 726, relating to pawnbrokers;

(MM) ORS 166.382 and 166.384, relating to destructive devices;

(NN) ORS 165.074;

(OO) ORS 86A.095 to 86A.198, relating to mortgage bankers and mortgage brokers;

(PP) ORS chapter 496, 497 or 498, relating to wildlife;

(QQ) ORS 163.355 to 163.427, relating to sexual offenses;

(RR) ORS 166.015, relating to riot;

(SS) ORS 166.155 and 166.165, relating to bias crimes;

(TT) ORS chapter 696, relating to real estate and escrow;

(UU) ORS chapter 704, relating to outfitters and guides;

(VV) ORS 165.692, relating to making a false claim for health care payment;

(WW) ORS 162.117, relating to public investment fraud;

(XX) ORS 164.170 or 164.172;

(YY) ORS 647.140, 647.145 or 647.150, relating to trademark counterfeiting;

(ZZ) ORS 164.886;

(AAA) ORS 167.312 and 167.388;

(BBB) ORS 164.889;

(CCC) ORS 165.800; or

(DDD) ORS 163.263, 163.264 or 163.266.

(b) Any conduct defined as “racketeering activity” under 18 U.S.C. 1961 (1)(B), (C), (D) and (E).

(7) “Unlawful debt” means any money or other thing of value constituting principal or interest of a debt that is legally unenforceable in the state in whole or in part because the debt was incurred or contracted:

(a) In violation of any one of the following:

(A) ORS chapter 462, relating to racing;

(B) ORS 167.108 to 167.164, relating to gambling; or

(b) In gambling activity in violation of federal law or in the business of lending money at a rate usurious under federal or state law.

(8) Notwithstanding contrary provisions in ORS 174.060, when this section references a statute in the Oregon Revised Statutes that is substantially different in the nature of its essential provisions from what the statute was when this section was enacted, the reference shall extend to and include amendments to the statute. [1981 c.769 §2; 1983 c.338 §898; 1983 c.715 §1; 1985 c.176 §5; 1985 c.557 §8; 1987 c.158 §31; 1987 c.249 §7; 1987 c.789 §20; 1987 c.907 §12; 1989 c.384 §2; 1989 c.839 §27; 1989 c.846 §13; 1989 c.982 §6; 1991 c.398 §3; 1991 c.962 §6; 1993 c.95 §13; 1993 c.215 §1; 1993 c.508 §45; 1993 c.680 §29; 1995 c.301 §35; 1995 c.440 §13; 1995 c.768 §10; 1997 c.631 §420; 1997 c.789 §1; 1997 c.867 §23; 1999 c.722 §8; 1999 c.878 §4; 2001 c.146 §1; 2001 c.147 §3; 2003 c.111 §1; 2003 c.484 §8; 2003 c.801 §15; 2003 c.804 §66; 2007 c.498 §3; 2007 c.585 §26; 2007 c.811 §7; 2007 c.869 §7; 2009 c.717 §25; 2011 c.597 §166; 2011 c.681 §6; 2013 c.584 §27; 2013 c.688 §23; 2017 c.21 §46; 2017 c.235 §21; 2019 c.553 §15]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 86 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: Am. Fed'n of Teachers-Oregon v. Oregon Taxpayers United Pac, 145 P.3d 1111 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Am. Fed'n of Teachers-Oregon v. Oregon Taxpayers United Pac, 145 P.3d 1111 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 34× “Defendants Oregon Taxpayers United Political Action Committee (OTU-PAC) and Oregon Taxpayers United Education Foundation (OTU-EF) appeal a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Oregon Education Association (OEA) and American Federation of Teachers (AFT), and intervenor State of…”

State v. Walker, 333 P.3d 316 (Or. 2014). · cites it 9× “The issue in this case is what constitutes an “enterprise” within the meaning of the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 -166.735. Defendant was charged in Clatsop County with one count of racketeering, ORS 166.”

State v. Charlesworth, 951 P.2d 153 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 21× “When ORS 166.715 was enacted in 1981, 4 money laundering was not included in the definition of racketeering activity in 18 USC § 1961 .”

Willms v. AmeriTitle, Inc., 499 P.3d 79 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 19× “, appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs Henry and Dolly Willms for $3,225,000, which was entered after a jury found for plaintiffs on their claims for fraud and violations of the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 to 166.735.1…”

Kilminster v. Day Mgmt. Corp., 919 P.2d 474 (Or. 1996). · cites it 10× “[2] Plaintiffs also alleged that defendants Day and DMC had engaged in a pattern of racketeering activities in violation of ORICO, ORS 166.715 to 166.735, and that those activities had resulted in decedent's death.”

Comput. Concepts, Inc. v. Brandt, 801 P.2d 800 (Or. 1990). · cites it 12× “370, and the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, ORS 166.715 to 166.735 (ORICO). 1 The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants on the securities law claim, on the ground that the transaction did not involve the sale of a security.”

State v. Stout, 415 P.3d 567 (Or. 2018). · cites it 7× “*569 **760 This case requires us to construe a pleading requirement that is unique to indictments charging a violation of the Oregon's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 to 166.735. ORICO prohibits various forms of involvement with a "pattern…”

State v. Cheek, 786 P.2d 1305 (Or. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 17× “ORS 166.715 et seq. He assigns as errors failure to grant his motion for judgment of acquittal, failure to instruct the jury as he requested and denial of his motion for a new trial.”

Cruze v. Hudler, 267 P.3d 176 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 13× “MOTIONS TO AMEND Plaintiffs next contend that the trial court erred in refusing to allow them to amend their complaint to add claims against Hudler and Markley under the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 to 166.735. Plaintiffs twice…”

Kotera v. Daioh Int'l U.S.A. Corp., 40 P.3d 506 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “As relevant to this appeal, plaintiff alleged claims for fraudulent transfer of a trust deed, violation of the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 through ORS 166.735 (1993), 1 and various acts of misconduct associated with a real…”

State v. Ortega-Gonsalez, 404 P.3d 1081 (Or. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 6× “The state specifically points to the fact that, under ORS 166.715(4), the statutory jeopardy bars of ORS 131.”

State v. Lyons, 985 P.2d 204 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 5× “ORS 166.715 et seq. 1 Before trial, defendant demurred to the indictment on several grounds and moved to sever his trial from that of his codefendants.”

Show all 86 citing cases →

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(2) — 15 cases

State v. Walker, 333 P.3d 316 (Or. 2014). “The issue in this case is what constitutes an “enterprise” within the meaning of the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 -166.735. Defendant was charged in Clatsop County with one count of racketeering, ORS 166.”

State v. Cheek, 786 P.2d 1305 (Or. Ct. App. 1990). “ORS 166.715 et seq. He assigns as errors failure to grant his motion for judgment of acquittal, failure to instruct the jury as he requested and denial of his motion for a new trial.”

Am. Fed'n of Teachers-Oregon v. Oregon Taxpayers United Pac, 145 P.3d 1111 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “Defendants Oregon Taxpayers United Political Action Committee (OTU-PAC) and Oregon Taxpayers United Education Foundation (OTU-EF) appeal a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Oregon Education Association (OEA) and American Federation of Teachers (AFT), and intervenor State of…”

State v. Walker, 285 P.3d 751 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Kilminster v. Day Mgmt. Corp., 919 P.2d 474 (Or. 1996). “[2] Plaintiffs also alleged that defendants Day and DMC had engaged in a pattern of racketeering activities in violation of ORICO, ORS 166.715 to 166.735, and that those activities had resulted in decedent's death.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(3) — 4 cases

State v. Blossom, 744 P.2d 281 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

Comput. Concepts, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Brandt, 780 P.2d 249 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

State v. Kincaid, 714 P.2d 624 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

State v. Powell, 727 P.2d 136 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(4) — 39 cases

Comput. Concepts, Inc. v. Brandt, 801 P.2d 800 (Or. 1990). “370, and the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, ORS 166.715 to 166.735 (ORICO). 1 The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants on the securities law claim, on the ground that the transaction did not involve the sale of a security.”

State v. Ortega-Gonsalez, 404 P.3d 1081 (Or. Ct. App. 2017). “The state specifically points to the fact that, under ORS 166.715(4), the statutory jeopardy bars of ORS 131.”

State v. Stout, 415 P.3d 567 (Or. 2018). “*569 **760 This case requires us to construe a pleading requirement that is unique to indictments charging a violation of the Oregon's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 to 166.735. ORICO prohibits various forms of involvement with a "pattern…”

Willms v. AmeriTitle, Inc., 499 P.3d 79 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “, appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs Henry and Dolly Willms for $3,225,000, which was entered after a jury found for plaintiffs on their claims for fraud and violations of the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 to 166.735.1…”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(5) — 8 cases

State v. Kincaid, 714 P.2d 624 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

State v. Blossom, 744 P.2d 281 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(5)(a) — 2 cases

State v. Kincaid, 714 P.2d 624 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

Comput. Concepts, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Brandt, 780 P.2d 249 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(5)(a)(V) — 1 case

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6) — 15 cases

Black v. Arizala, 48 P.3d 843 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).

Penuel v. Titan/Value Equities Grp., Inc., 872 P.2d 28 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Kotera v. Daioh Int'l U.S.A. Corp., 40 P.3d 506 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “As relevant to this appeal, plaintiff alleged claims for fraudulent transfer of a trust deed, violation of the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 through ORS 166.735 (1993), 1 and various acts of misconduct associated with a real…”

State v. Romig, 700 P.2d 293 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(B) — 3 cases

Oregon Educ. Ass'n v. Oregon Taxpayers United PAC, 204 P.3d 855 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Am. Fed'n of Teachers v. Oregon Taxpayers United Pac, 189 P.3d 9 (Or. 2008).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(P) — 1 case

Cruze v. Hudler, 267 P.3d 176 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “MOTIONS TO AMEND Plaintiffs next contend that the trial court erred in refusing to allow them to amend their complaint to add claims against Hudler and Markley under the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 to 166.735. Plaintiffs twice…”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a) — 8 cases

Canell v. Multnomah Cnty., 141 F. Supp. 2d 1046 (D. Or. 2001).

Comput. Concepts, Inc. v. Brandt, 905 P.2d 1177 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a)(A) — 3 cases

Comput. Concepts, Inc. v. Brandt, 905 P.2d 1177 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

Great Am. Ins. v. Linderman, 116 F. Supp. 3d 1183 (D. Or. 2015).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a)(B) — 6 cases

Oregon Educ. Ass'n v. Parks, 291 P.3d 789 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Am. Fed'n of Teachers v. Oregon Taxpayers United Pac, 189 P.3d 9 (Or. 2008).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a)(G) — 2 cases

Planned Parenthood of Columbia/Williamette, Inc. v. Am. Coalition of Life Activists, 945 F. Supp. 1355 (D. Or. 1996).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a)(GG) — 1 case

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a)(I) — 1 case

Planned Parenthood of Columbia/Williamette, Inc. v. Am. Coalition of Life Activists, 945 F. Supp. 1355 (D. Or. 1996).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a)(K) — 4 cases

State v. Walker, 285 P.3d 751 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Taylor v. Hender, 840 P.2d 1331 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

State Accident Ins. Fund v. Anderson, 894 P.2d 1152 (Or. 1995).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a)(NN) — 1 case

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a)(P) — 5 cases

State v. Romig, 700 P.2d 293 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Am. Fed'n of Teachers v. Oregon Taxpayers United Pac, 189 P.3d 9 (Or. 2008).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a)(Q) — 2 cases

Taylor v. Hender, 840 P.2d 1331 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a)(T) — 1 case

Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana, 489 U.S. 46 (1989).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a)(TT) — 1 case

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(a)(V) — 1 case

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(6)(b) — 3 cases

State v. Charlesworth, 951 P.2d 153 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). “When ORS 166.715 was enacted in 1981, 4 money laundering was not included in the definition of racketeering activity in 18 USC § 1961 .”

State v. Romig, 700 P.2d 293 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Taylor v. Hender, 840 P.2d 1331 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(l)(b) — 1 case

State Accident Ins. Fund v. Anderson, 894 P.2d 1152 (Or. 1995).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.715(l)(c) — 1 case

State Accident Ins. Fund v. Anderson, 894 P.2d 1152 (Or. 1995).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.