Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 167.132 (2026)

Possession of gambling records in the second degree

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      167.132 Possession of gambling records in the second degree. (1) A person commits the crime of possession of gambling records in the second degree if, with knowledge of the contents thereof, the person possesses any writing, paper, instrument or article:

      (a) Of a kind commonly used in the operation or promotion of a bookmaking scheme or enterprise; or

      (b) Of a kind commonly used in the operation, promotion or playing of a lottery or numbers scheme or enterprise.

      (2) Possession of gambling records in the second degree is a Class A misdemeanor. [1971 c.743 §266]

 

      167.135 [Repealed by 1971 c.743 §432]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1978–1981 · leading case: Gaffey v. Babb, 624 P.2d 616 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gaffey v. Babb, 624 P.2d 616 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “Yancey, supra , we upheld a statute prohibiting the possession of gambling records (ORS 167.132) in the face of a contention that the statute was unconstitutionally vague on its face.”
State v. Yancey, 574 P.2d 358 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 3× “ORS 167.132 provides: "(1) A person commits the crime of possession of gambling records in the second degree if, with knowledge of the contents thereof, he possess any writing, paper, instrument or article: "(a) Of a kind commonly used in the operation or promotion of a…”
State v. Terry, 587 P.2d 1033 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 4× “ORS 167.132. 1 The police had seized from defendant’s residence over a million two-and-one-half inch by six inch cards.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 167.132(l)(b) — 1 case
State v. Terry, 587 P.2d 1033 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). “ORS 167.132. 1 The police had seized from defendant’s residence over a million two-and-one-half inch by six inch cards.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.