167.365
Dogfighting. (1) A
person commits the crime of dogfighting if the person knowingly does any of the
following:
(a) Owns,
possesses, keeps, breeds, trains, buys, sells or offers to sell a fighting dog,
including but not limited to any advertisement by the person to sell such a
dog.
(b) Promotes,
conducts or participates in, or performs any service in the furtherance of, an
exhibition of dogfighting, including but not limited to refereeing of a
dogfight, handling of dogs at a dogfight, transportation of spectators to a
dogfight, organizing a dogfight, advertising a dogfight, providing or serving
as a stakes holder for any money wagered on a fight.
(c) Keeps, uses
or manages, or accepts payment of admission to, any place kept or used for the
purpose of dogfighting.
(d) Suffers or
permits any place over which the person has possession or control to be
occupied, kept or used for the purpose of an exhibition of dogfighting.
(2) Dogfighting
is a Class C felony. [1987 c.249 §2]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 2016–2016 · leading case:
State v. Newcomb, 375 P.3d 434 (Or. 2016).
State v. Newcomb, 375 P.3d 434 (Or. 2016).
“, ORS 167.365(1) (person commits crime of “dogfighting” if person knowingly “ [o] wns, possesses, keeps, breeds, trains, buys, sells or offers to sell a fighting dog”); ORS 609.”
State v. Newcomb (Or. 2016).
“, ORS 167.365(1) (person com- mits crime of “dogfighting” if person knowingly “[o]wns, possesses, keeps, breeds, trains, buys, sells or offers to sell a fighting dog”); ORS 609.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 167.365(1) — 2 cases
State v. Newcomb, 375 P.3d 434 (Or. 2016).
“, ORS 167.365(1) (person commits crime of “dogfighting” if person knowingly “ [o] wns, possesses, keeps, breeds, trains, buys, sells or offers to sell a fighting dog”); ORS 609.”
State v. Newcomb (Or. 2016).
“, ORS 167.365(1) (person com- mits crime of “dogfighting” if person knowingly “[o]wns, possesses, keeps, breeds, trains, buys, sells or offers to sell a fighting dog”); ORS 609.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.