Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 167.437 (2026)

Constructive possession of fighting birds or source birds; procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      167.437 Constructive possession of fighting birds or source birds; procedure. (1) A peace officer having jurisdiction may, upon probable cause to believe that a bird is a fighting bird or source bird, take constructive possession of the bird on behalf of the law enforcement agency employing the officer.

      (2) A peace officer who takes constructive possession of an alleged fighting bird or source bird pursuant to this section must do the following:

      (a) Place a tag or other device approved by the law enforcement agency on the cage or other enclosure where the alleged fighting bird or source bird is located. The tag or other device must clearly state that it is unlawful to conceal, remove or release the bird for purposes of interfering with law enforcement agency control over the bird.

      (b) Notify the owner, possessor or keeper of the bird that the bird has been seized by the law enforcement agency and may not be concealed, removed or released until authorized by a court or as provided in this section.

      (c) Promptly apply to an appropriate court for an order described in ORS 167.433.

      (3) If a law enforcement agency takes constructive possession of an alleged fighting bird or source bird under this section, the owner, possessor or keeper of the bird shall provide all necessary care for the bird.

      (4) Constructive possession of an alleged fighting bird or source bird pursuant to this section terminates when a court order described in ORS 167.433 is served on the owner, possessor or keeper of the bird, or after 24 hours, whichever occurs first. [2003 c.484 §6; 2017 c.276 §4]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2003–2003 · leading case: State v. Hart, 72 P.3d 671 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Hart, 72 P.3d 671 (Or. Ct. App. 2003). “The relevant consideration, according to the court, is the relationship between the two proceedings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.