Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 167.755 (2026)

Selling tobacco products or inhalant delivery systems to person under 21 years of age; penalties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      167.755 Selling tobacco products or inhalant delivery systems to person under 21 years of age; penalties. (1) A person commits the offense of selling tobacco products or inhalant delivery systems to a person under 21 years of age upon the occurrence of one of the following:

      (a) The person knowingly distributes or sells, or allows to be sold, to a person under 21 years of age, tobacco products;

      (b) The person knowingly distributes or sells, or allows to be sold, to a person under 21 years of age, an inhalant delivery system;

      (c) If the person is a manager or other person who supervises the retail sale of tobacco products or inhalant delivery systems, the person is acting within the course and scope of the person’s employment and the person has supervisory authority over a person who violates paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection; or

      (d) If the person is an owner of a business that sells tobacco products or inhalant delivery systems at retail, a violation of paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection occurs at the business.

      (2)(a) Violation of subsection (1)(a) or (b) of this section is a specific fine violation punishable by a fine not to exceed $50.

      (b) Violation of subsection (1)(c) of this section is a specific fine violation punishable by a fine not to exceed:

      (A) $250 for the first or second violation; or

      (B) $500 for the third or subsequent violation.

      (c) Violation of subsection (1)(d) of this section is a specific fine violation punishable by a fine not to exceed:

      (A) $500 for the first or second violation; or

      (B) $1,000 for the third or subsequent violation. [2017 c.701 §2]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2021–2024 · leading case: Dalbeck v. Bi-Mart Corp., 500 P.3d 711 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
Dalbeck v. Bi-Mart Corp., 500 P.3d 711 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “The statutes that defen- dant identifies are as follows: ORS 167.755; ORS 646A.140; ORS 480.225; ORS 471.”
Bates v. Oregon Health Auth., 559 P.3d 924 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “ORS 167.755; ORS 167.765; ORS 431A.175(2)(e).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.