Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310 (2026)

Definitions for chapter

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

183.310 Definitions for chapter. As used in this chapter:

(1) “Agency” means any state board, commission, department, or division thereof, or officer authorized by law to make rules or to issue orders, except those in the legislative and judicial branches.

(2)(a) “Contested case” means a proceeding before an agency:

(A) In which the individual legal rights, duties or privileges of specific parties are required by statute or Constitution to be determined only after an agency hearing at which such specific parties are entitled to appear and be heard;

(B) Where the agency has discretion to suspend or revoke a right or privilege of a person;

(C) For the suspension, revocation or refusal to renew or issue a license where the licensee or applicant for a license demands such hearing; or

(D) Where the agency by rule or order provides for hearings substantially of the character required by ORS 183.415, 183.417, 183.425, 183.450, 183.460 and 183.470.

(b) “Contested case” does not include proceedings in which an agency decision rests solely on the result of a test.

(3) “Economic effect” means the economic impact on affected businesses by and the costs of compliance, if any, with a rule for businesses, including but not limited to the costs of equipment, supplies, labor and administration.

(4) “Hearing officer” includes an administrative law judge.

(5) “License” includes the whole or part of any agency permit, certificate, approval, registration or similar form of permission required by law to pursue any commercial activity, trade, occupation or profession.

(6)(a) “Order” means any agency action expressed orally or in writing directed to a named person or named persons, other than employees, officers or members of an agency. “Order” includes any agency determination or decision issued in connection with a contested case proceeding. “Order” includes:

(A) Agency action under ORS chapter 657 making determination for purposes of unemployment compensation of employees of the state;

(B) Agency action under ORS chapter 240 which grants, denies, modifies, suspends or revokes any right or privilege of an employee of the state; and

(b) “Final order” means final agency action expressed in writing. “Final order” does not include any tentative or preliminary agency declaration or statement that:

(A) Precedes final agency action; or

(B) Does not preclude further agency consideration of the subject matter of the statement or declaration.

(7) “Party” means:

(a) Each person or agency entitled as of right to a hearing before the agency;

(b) Each person or agency named by the agency to be a party; or

(c) Any person requesting to participate before the agency as a party or in a limited party status which the agency determines either has an interest in the outcome of the agency’s proceeding or represents a public interest in such result. The agency’s determination is subject to judicial review in the manner provided by ORS 183.482 after the agency has issued its final order in the proceedings.

(8) “Person” means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, governmental subdivision or public or private organization of any character other than an agency.

(9) “Rule” means any agency directive, standard, regulation or statement of general applicability that implements, interprets or prescribes law or policy, or describes the procedure or practice requirements of any agency. The term includes the amendment or repeal of a prior rule, but does not include:

(a) Unless a hearing is required by statute, internal management directives, regulations or statements which do not substantially affect the interests of the public:

(A) Between agencies, or their officers or their employees; or

(B) Within an agency, between its officers or between employees.

(b) Action by agencies directed to other agencies or other units of government which do not substantially affect the interests of the public.

(d) Intra-agency memoranda.

(e) Executive orders of the Governor.

(f) Rules of conduct for persons committed to the physical and legal custody of the Department of Corrections, the violation of which will not result in:

(A) Placement in segregation or isolation status in excess of seven days.

(B) Institutional transfer or other transfer to secure confinement status for disciplinary reasons.

(10)(a) “Small business” means a corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship or other legal entity formed for the purpose of making a profit, which is independently owned and operated from all other businesses and which has 50 or fewer employees.

(b) “Small business” does not include a coordinated care organization as defined in ORS 414.025. [1957 c.717 §1; 1965 c.285 §78a; 1967 c.419 §32; 1969 c.80 §37a; 1971 c.734 §1; 1973 c.386 §4; 1973 c.621 §1a; 1977 c.374 §1; 1977 c.798 §1; 1979 c.593 §6; 1981 c.755 §1; 1987 c.320 §141; 1987 c.861 §1; 2003 c.75 §71; 2005 c.523 §8; 2007 c.288 §9; 2019 c.529 §4]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 516 cases (52 in the last 5 years), 1883–2026 · leading case: Oregon Env't Council v. Oregon State Bd. of Educ., 761 P.2d 1322 (Or. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Oregon Env't Council v. Oregon State Bd. of Educ., 761 P.2d 1322 (Or. 1988). · cites it 44× “THE AGENCY DECISION WAS NOT A RULE ORS 183.310 to 183.550, commonly called the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), defines rules and orders in part by the breadth of their respective applications.”

Smith v. Two Rivers Corr. Inst., 312 P.3d 568 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 23× “As we explained in Smith, ORS 183.310(6)(a) defines “order,” in part, as an “agency action *** directed to a named person or named persons [.”

Wheaton v. Kulongoski, 147 P.3d 1163 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 24× “ORS 183.310(2)(a) defines a "[c]ontested case" to include "a proceeding before an agency: "(A) In which the individual legal rights, duties or privileges of specific parties are required by statute or Constitution to be determined only after an agency hearing at which such…”

Application of Portland Gen. Elec. Co., 561 P.2d 154 (Or. 1977). · cites it 12× “[3] The requirement applies most obviously to the typical case when the party seeking judicial review is the one whose license or other "individual legal rights, duties, or privileges" are the occasion of the contested case, ORS 183.310, and to procedural or evidentiary *161…”

Harris v. Bd. of Parole, 614 P.2d 602 (Or. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 16× “Furthermore, prior to the enactment of chapter 694, and thereafter until 1979 (Oregon Laws 1979, chapter 593, section 6), the Administrative Procedures Act, ORS 183.310(4), only defined "order" as "any agency action * * * directed to a named person or named persons, other than…”

Pete's Mountain Homeowners Ass'n v. Oregon Water Resources Dep't, 238 P.3d 395 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 10× “560 (1983), repealed by Or Laws 1985, ch 673, § 185, which provided that “[a]ny person, public corporation or state agency aggrieved by any order, rule or regulation of the Water Policy Review Board * * * may appeal from the same to the circuit court of the county in which the…”

Oregon Bus. Plan. Council v. Dep't of Land Conservation & Dev., 626 P.2d 350 (Or. 1981). · cites it 12× “LCDC "acknowledgment proceedings” are not "contested cases” within the requirements of ORS 183.310(2) and 183.482. It is contended by most of the parties to these consolidated cases other than LCDC that LCDC "acknowledgment proceedings” are "contested cases” for the purposes of…”

Don't Waste Oregon Comm. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 881 P.2d 119 (Or. 1994). · cites it 6× “ORS 183.310, a part of the APA, defines "order" and "rule": "(5)(a) `Order' means any agency action expressed orally or in writing directed to a named person or named persons, other than employees, officers or members of an agency.”

Megdal v. Oregon State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 605 P.2d 273 (Or. 1980). · cites it 6× “ORS 183.310(2)(a)(A). Irrespective of due process, subsection (2)(a)(C) requires these procedures in any proceeding for the "suspension, revocation or refusal to renew or issue a license .”

Utsey v. Coos Cnty., 32 P.3d 933 (Or. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 6× “[4] See ORS 183.310 to ORS 183.550. [5] See ORS 28.”

League of Oregon Cities v. State, 56 P.3d 892 (Or. 2002). · cites it 4× “The second category of appealable conduct in subsection (1) includes any "order" or "rule," two kinds of legal action that the legislature has exposed to judicial review under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), ORS 183.310 to 183.550. See ORS 183.400 (providing for…”

Trebesch v. Emp. Div., 710 P.2d 136 (Or. 1985). · cites it 5× “Rather, the answer is a matter of statutory interpretation, the relevant statutes being those regulating the particular agency whose action is challenged.”

Show all 516 citing cases →

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(1) — 52 cases

McPherson v. Emp. Div., 591 P.2d 1381 (Or. 1979).

Koch v. City of Portland, 760 P.2d 252 (Or. 1988).

Pangle v. Bend-LaPine Sch. Dist., 10 P.3d 275 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

State Ex Rel. Frohnmayer v. Oregon State Bar, 767 P.2d 893 (Or. 1989).

Trebesch v. Emp. Div., 710 P.2d 136 (Or. 1985). “Rather, the answer is a matter of statutory interpretation, the relevant statutes being those regulating the particular agency whose action is challenged.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(10) — 2 cases

Oregon Cable Telecomm. Ass'n v. Dep't of Revenue, 240 P.3d 1122 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

Fick v. Oregon Dep't of Fish & Wildlife, 346 P.3d 604 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(10)(a) — 1 case

City of Cornelius v. Dept. of Land Conservation (Or. Ct. App. 2024).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(2) — 35 cases

Application of Portland Gen. Elec. Co., 561 P.2d 154 (Or. 1977). “[3] The requirement applies most obviously to the typical case when the party seeking judicial review is the one whose license or other "individual legal rights, duties, or privileges" are the occasion of the contested case, ORS 183.310, and to procedural or evidentiary *161…”

Oregon Bus. Plan. Council v. Dep't of Land Conservation & Dev., 626 P.2d 350 (Or. 1981). “LCDC "acknowledgment proceedings” are not "contested cases” within the requirements of ORS 183.310(2) and 183.482. It is contended by most of the parties to these consolidated cases other than LCDC that LCDC "acknowledgment proceedings” are "contested cases” for the purposes of…”

Patton v. State Bd. of Higher Educ., 647 P.2d 931 (Or. 1982).

Oregon Env't Council v. Oregon State Bd. of Educ., 761 P.2d 1322 (Or. 1988). “THE AGENCY DECISION WAS NOT A RULE ORS 183.310 to 183.550, commonly called the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), defines rules and orders in part by the breadth of their respective applications.”

Bay River, Inc. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 554 P.2d 620 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(2)(a) — 36 cases

Noble v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 964 P.2d 990 (Or. 1998).

Wheaton v. Kulongoski, 147 P.3d 1163 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “ORS 183.310(2)(a) defines a "[c]ontested case" to include "a proceeding before an agency: "(A) In which the individual legal rights, duties or privileges of specific parties are required by statute or Constitution to be determined only after an agency hearing at which such…”

Corey v. Dep't of Land Conservation & Dev., 152 P.3d 933 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(2)(a)(A) — 23 cases

Megdal v. Oregon State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 605 P.2d 273 (Or. 1980). “ORS 183.310(2)(a)(A). Irrespective of due process, subsection (2)(a)(C) requires these procedures in any proceeding for the "suspension, revocation or refusal to renew or issue a license .”

G.A.S.P. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 108 P.3d 95 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(2)(a)(B) — 10 cases

Liu v. Portland State Univ., 383 P.3d 294 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).

Pen-Nor, Inc. v. Oregon Dep't of Higher Educ., 734 P.2d 395 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

Clarke Elec., Inc. v. State ex rel. State High. Div., 763 P.2d 1199 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Fairbanks v. Bureau of Labor & Indus., 913 P.2d 703 (Or. 1996).

Berry v. Metro Elec. Jt. Apprenticeship & Training Comm., 963 P.2d 712 (Or. Ct. App. 1998).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(2)(a)(C) — 6 cases

Cooper v. Eugene Sch. Dist. No. 4J, 723 P.2d 298 (Or. 1986).

State v. Ratliff, 744 P.2d 247 (Or. 1987).

Carnine v. Oregon State Textbook Comm'n, 660 P.2d 201 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

Mercy Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Off. of Health Policy, 855 P.2d 1156 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(2)(a)(D) — 9 cases

BWK, Inc. v. Dep't of Admin. Servs., 218 P.3d 156 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Oregon Health Care Ass'n v. Health Div., 941 P.2d 593 (Or. Ct. App. 1997).

Reforestation Gen. Contractors, Inc. v. Filings of the Nat'l Council on Comp. Ins., 872 P.2d 423 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Norden v. State, 973 P.2d 910 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(2)(b) — 3 cases

Rooklidge v. Dmv, 174 P.3d 1120 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Rooklidge v. Driver & Motor Veh. Servs. Branch of the Oregon Dep't of Transp., 174 P.3d 1120 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Fitzgerald v. Oregon Bd. of Optometry, 706 P.2d 586 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(2)(c) — 3 cases

Bay River, Inc. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 554 P.2d 620 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).

Reynolds v. Child.'s Servs. Div., 571 P.2d 505 (Or. 1977).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(2)(d) — 1 case

Larsen v. Bd. of Parole, 138 P.3d 16 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(3) — 3 cases

Oregon Cable Telecomm. Ass'n v. Dep't of Revenue, 240 P.3d 1122 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

Dika v. Dep't of Ins. & Fin., 817 P.2d 287 (Or. 1991).

City of Cornelius v. Dept. of Land Conservation (Or. Ct. App. 2024).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(3)(c) — 1 case

Lis v. Oregon State Bd. of Higher Educ., 577 P.2d 1370 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(4) — 17 cases

Harris v. Bd. of Parole, 614 P.2d 602 (Or. Ct. App. 1980). “Furthermore, prior to the enactment of chapter 694, and thereafter until 1979 (Oregon Laws 1979, chapter 593, section 6), the Administrative Procedures Act, ORS 183.310(4), only defined "order" as "any agency action * * * directed to a named person or named persons, other than…”

Burke v. Child.'s Servs. Div., 607 P.2d 141 (Or. 1980).

Portland Inn, Inc. v. Oregon Transp. Comm'n, 593 P.2d 1233 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).

Wyers v. Dressler, 601 P.2d 1268 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(4)(a) — 3 cases

West Side Sanitary Dist. v. Health Div. of the Dep't of Human Resources, 614 P.2d 1151 (Or. 1980).

Oregon Bus. Plan. Council v. Dep't of Land Conservation, & Dev., 619 P.2d 1291 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(4)(b) — 3 cases

Cruz v. Oregon State Bd. of Parole, 631 P.2d 829 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

Land Reclamation, Inc. v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 632 P.2d 37 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(5) — 24 cases

Don't Waste Oregon Comm. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 881 P.2d 119 (Or. 1994). “ORS 183.310, a part of the APA, defines "order" and "rule": "(5)(a) `Order' means any agency action expressed orally or in writing directed to a named person or named persons, other than employees, officers or members of an agency.”

State Ex Rel. Keisling v. Norblad, 860 P.2d 241 (Or. 1993).

Brian v. Oregon Gov't Ethics Comm'n, 874 P.2d 1294 (Or. 1994).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(5)(a) — 18 cases

Pac. Nw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Eachus, 813 P.2d 46 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Ellis v. Roberts, 725 P.2d 886 (Or. 1986).

Gruszczynski v. State of Oregon Bd. of Higher Educ., 806 P.2d 1168 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(5)(b) — 27 cases

Teel Irrigation Dist. v. Water Resources Dep't, 919 P.2d 1172 (Or. 1996).

Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Clatsop Co.), 724 P.2d 805 (Or. 1986).

Brian v. Oregon Gov't Ethics Comm'n, 874 P.2d 1294 (Or. 1994).

Brian v. Oregon Gov't Ethics Com'n, 891 P.2d 649 (Or. 1995).

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Institutional Animal Care & Use Comm., 817 P.2d 1299 (Or. 1991).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(5)(c) — 1 case

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Richmond, 591 P.2d 728 (Or. 1979).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(6) — 16 cases

Powell v. Bunn, 59 P.3d 559 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).

Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. Bd. of Forestry, 69 P.3d 1238 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).

Oregon Health Care Ass'n v. Health Div., 992 P.2d 434 (Or. 1999).

McNichols v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife, 482 P.3d 208 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(6)(a) — 17 cases

Sky Lakes Med. Ctr. v. Dept. of Human Servs., 484 P.3d 1107 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Hayes Oyster Co. v. DEQ, 504 P.3d 15 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Douglas Cnty. v. Fish & Wildlife Comm'n, 525 P.3d 504 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(6)(b) — 32 cases

Oregon Restaurant Servs., Inc. v. Oregon State Lottery, 112 P.3d 398 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

Wright v. Pub. Emps. Ret. Bd., 425 P.3d 442 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).

Hawes v. State, 125 P.3d 778 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

Mastriano v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 159 P.3d 1151 (Or. 2007).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(6)(b)(A) — 4 cases

Grobovsky v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 159 P.3d 1245 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Inbound v. Dept. of Forestry, 252 P.3d 336 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).

Inbound, LLC v. Dep't of Forestry, 252 P.3d 336 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(6)(b)(B) — 2 cases

Grobovsky v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 159 P.3d 1245 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Studor, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Dcbs, 197 P.3d 554 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(6)(c) — 3 cases

Utsey v. Coos Cnty., 32 P.3d 933 (Or. Ct. App. 2001). “[4] See ORS 183.310 to ORS 183.550. [5] See ORS 28.”

Waterwatch of Oregon, Inc. v. Boeing Agri-Indus. Co., 963 P.2d 744 (Or. Ct. App. 1998).

Utsey v. Coos Cnty., 32 P.3d 933 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(7) — 23 cases

Pete's Mountain Homeowners Ass'n v. Oregon Water Resources Dep't, 238 P.3d 395 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “560 (1983), repealed by Or Laws 1985, ch 673, § 185, which provided that “[a]ny person, public corporation or state agency aggrieved by any order, rule or regulation of the Water Policy Review Board * * * may appeal from the same to the circuit court of the county in which the…”

Burke v. Pub. Welfare Div., 570 P.2d 87 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(7)(a) — 10 cases

Burke v. Child.'s Servs. Div., 552 P.2d 592 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).

Burke v. Child.'s Servs. Div., 607 P.2d 141 (Or. 1980).

Rogue Flyfishers, Inc. v. Water Policy Review Bd., 660 P.2d 1089 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

Portland Inn, Inc. v. Oregon Transp. Comm'n, 593 P.2d 1233 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(7)(b) — 1 case

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(7)(c) — 3 cases

Stop B2H Coalition v. Dept. of Energy, 525 P.3d 864 (Or. 2023).

Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac. Siting Coun., 486 P.3d 787 (Or. 2021).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(7Xa) — 1 case

Portland Inn, Inc. v. Oregon Transp. Comm'n, 593 P.2d 1233 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(8) — 40 cases

League of Oregon Cities v. State, 56 P.3d 892 (Or. 2002). “The second category of appealable conduct in subsection (1) includes any "order" or "rule," two kinds of legal action that the legislature has exposed to judicial review under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), ORS 183.310 to 183.550. See ORS 183.400 (providing for…”

Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor & Indus., 903 P.2d 351 (Or. 1995).

Hay v. Oregon Dep't of Transp., 719 P.2d 860 (Or. 1986).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(8)(a) — 3 cases

Rogue Flyfishers, Inc. v. Water Policy Review Bd., 660 P.2d 1089 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

Oregon Occupational Saf. & Health Div. v. Eslinger Logging, Inc., 967 P.2d 889 (Or. Ct. App. 1998).

State v. Stevens Equip. Co., 998 P.2d 1278 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(8)(a)(B) — 1 case

Oregon State Police Officers Ass'n v. State, 783 P.2d 7 (Or. 1989).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(8)(c) — 1 case

Rajneesh Found. Int'l v. Corp. Comm'r, 671 P.2d 1203 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(8)(f) — 1 case

Smith v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 832 P.2d 1270 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(9) — 40 cases

Smith v. Two Rivers Corr. Inst., 312 P.3d 568 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “As we explained in Smith, ORS 183.310(6)(a) defines “order,” in part, as an “agency action *** directed to a named person or named persons [.”

Smith v. Dept. of Corr., 454 P.3d 12 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).

Smith v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 284 P.3d 1150 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Just. Resource Ctr. v. Bd. of Parole, 338 Or. App. 509 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).

Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 373 Or. 405 (Or. 2025).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(9)(a) — 8 cases

Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 373 Or. 405 (Or. 2025).

Smith v. Dep't of Corr., 369 P.3d 1213 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).

Douglas Cnty. v. Fish & Wildlife Comm'n, 525 P.3d 504 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).

Just. Resource Ctr. v. Bd. of Parole, 338 Or. App. 509 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).

Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 373 Or. 405 (Or. 2025).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(9)(b) — 1 case

Just. Resource Ctr. v. Bd. of Parole, 338 Or. App. 509 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(9)(c) — 2 cases

PNW Metal Recycling, Inc. v. DEQ (Or. 2023).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(9)(d) — 3 cases

PNW Metal Recycling, Inc. v. DEQ, 317 Or. App. 207 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

PNW Metal Recycling, Inc. v. DEQ (Or. 2023).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(9)(e) — 2 cases

Mooney v. Oregon Health Auth., 500 P.3d 79 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Along Came Trudy LLC v. OLCC (Or. Ct. App. 2024).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(9)(f) — 4 cases

Smith v. Dep't of Corr., 388 P.3d 1118 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).

Smith v. Dep't of Corr., 284 P.3d 1244 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Smith v. Dept. of Corr., 456 P.3d 310 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.310(9)(f)(C) — 1 case

Smith v. Dep't of Corr., 388 P.3d 1118 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.