Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 192.050 (2026)

Copying records; evidentiary effect

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      192.050 Copying records; evidentiary effect. A state agency or political subdivision may, with the approval of the proper budgetary authority, cause any public records in its official custody to be photocopied or captured by digital imaging system, as in the case of original filings or recordings, or recorded by audio or video technology. Each photocopy, digital image, audio recording and video recording shall be made in accordance with the appropriate standard as determined by the State Archivist. Every such reproduction shall be deemed an original; and a transcript, exemplification or certified copy of any such reproduction shall be deemed a transcript, exemplification or certified copy, as the case may be, of the original. [Amended by 1961 c.160 §6; 1991 c.671 §4; 2023 c.35 §3]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1977–1977 · leading case: State v. Pingelton, 570 P.2d 666 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).
State v. Pingelton, 570 P.2d 666 (Or. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 2× “” See also ORS 192.050. Neither authority, nor policy, nor logic suggests any sound reason why a "signature” within the meaning of ORS 71.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.