Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.250 (2026)

Compliance with goals required

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      197.250 Compliance with goals required. Except as otherwise provided in ORS 197.245, all comprehensive plans and land use regulations adopted by a local government to carry out those comprehensive plans and all plans, programs, rules or regulations affecting land use adopted by a state agency or special district shall be in compliance with the goals within one year after the date those goals are approved by the Land Conservation and Development Commission. [1973 c.80 §32; 1977 c.664 §19; 1981 c.748 §29a; 1983 c.827 §56a]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1976–2024 · leading case: Alexanderson v. Bd. of Commissioners, 616 P.2d 459 (Or. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Alexanderson v. Bd. of Commissioners, 616 P.2d 459 (Or. 1980). · cites it 4× “050(3), ORS 197.250. The law prescribes procedures for LCDC to determine whether comprehensive plans or zoning, subdivision, or other ordinances or regulations comply with the goals, or to provide limited extensions of time for bringing them into compliance.”
South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Bd. of Commissioners, 569 P.2d 1063 (Or. 1977). · cites it 2× “However, some question arises because of ORS 197.250, which provides: "All comprehensive plans and any zoning, subdivision and other ordinances and regulations adopted by a state agency, city, county, or special district to carry out such plans shall be in conformity with the…”
Ochoco Constr., Inc. v. Dep't of Land Conservation & Dev., 667 P.2d 499 (Or. 1983). · cites it 3× “ORS 197.250. Upon request of a city or county, the Commission will review their comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances for compliance with the statewide goals under the provisions of ORS 197.”
Lane Cnty. v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 942 P.2d 278 (Or. 1997). “ORS 197.250; 197.251. ORS chapter 215 authorizes counties to establish exclusive farm use zones.”
Bienz v. City of Dayton, 566 P.2d 904 (Or. Ct. App. 1977). “044(6) requires that local subdivision ordinances and decisions thereunder must comply with the city’s comprehensive plan, hi addition, ORS 197.250 provides that: "All comprehensive plans and any zoning, subdivision and other ordinances and regulations adopted by a state agency,…”
Foland v. Jackson Cnty., 807 P.2d 801 (Or. 1991). · cites it 2× “ORS 197.250. The statutes also provide for LCDC “acknowledgement” of a comprehensive plan’s compliance with the goals.”
Jurgenson v. Cnty. Court for Union Cnty., 600 P.2d 1241 (Or. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “” Third, ORS 197.250 provides that city and county ordinances adopted "to carry out such [comprehensive] plans * * * shall be in conformity with the state-wide planning goals * * Fourth, ORS 197.”
Petersen v. Mayor Etc. City of Klamath Falls, 566 P.2d 1193 (Or. 1977). “175 (as amended) and ORS 197.250, the adoption of any annexation ordinance must now be done in accordance with the LCDC goals.”
1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 752 P.2d 271 (Or. 1988). “ORS 197.250. In acknowledging a plan as being in compliance with the goals, LCDC must “[i]nclude a clear statement of findings in support of the determinations of compliance.”
Oregon Bus. Plan. Council v. Dep't of Land Conservation & Dev., 626 P.2d 350 (Or. 1981). “ORS 197.250 provides that all comprehensive land use plans adopted by *746 cities and counties shall be in conformity with statewide land use planning goals adopted by LCDC.”
Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.), 724 P.2d 268 (Or. 1986). “However, Goal 2 requires that the "implementation measures," including zoning ordinances, must be "consistent" with the plan, and ORS 197.250 requires that all land use provisions be "in compliance" with the goals.”
Columbia Hills Dev. Co. v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 624 P.2d 157 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 3× “See ORS 197.250. An Enforcement Order was issued on April 10, 1979, by LCDC pursuant to ORS *488 197.”
Show all 35 citing cases →
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.250(1) — 3 cases
Akiyama v. Tillamook Cnty., 333 Or. App. 315 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
Winters v. Tillamook Cnty., 330 Or. App. 188 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
Akiyama v. Tillamook Cnty. (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.