Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.650 (2026)

Appeal to Court of Appeals; standing

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

197.650 Appeal to Court of Appeals; standing. (1) A Land Conservation and Development Commission final order issued pursuant to ORS 197.180, 197.251, 197.626, 197.628 to 197.651, 197.652 to 197.658, 197.659, 215.780 or 215.788 to 215.794 may be appealed to the Court of Appeals by persons who participated in proceedings, if any, that led to issuance of the final order being appealed.

(2) Jurisdiction for judicial review of a final order of the commission issued pursuant to ORS 197.180, 197.251, 197.626, 197.628 to 197.651, 197.652 to 197.658, 197.659, 215.780 or 215.788 to 215.794 is conferred upon the Court of Appeals. [1981 c.748 §10; 1983 c.827 §52; 1989 c.761 §8; 1991 c.612 §16; 1997 c.247 §1; 1999 c.622 §7; 2009 c.606 §5; 2009 c.873 §13a; 2011 c.469 §5]

Note: See note under 197.646.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 22 cases, 1982–2015 · leading case: 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 752 P.2d 271 (Or. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 752 P.2d 271 (Or. 1988). · cites it 8× “ORS 197.650 directs that appeals of commission orders shall be “in the manner provided in ORS 183.”

Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Clatsop Co.), 724 P.2d 805 (Or. 1986). · cites it 4× “42 ( sic ) and ORS 197.650. * * *." Shortly after receiving the letter and accompanying orders Clatsop County notified LCDC that Finding of Fact Number 1 in the acknowledgment order was incorrect in stating that Clatsop County's acknowledgment request previously had been…”

City of West Linn v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 119 P.3d 285 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 5× “LCDC’s decision is subject to judicial review “in the manner provided in ORS 197.650.” ORS 197.644(3)(a). ORS 197.”

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 259 P.3d 1021 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “Federation For Sound Planning, 64 Or App 226, 237 , 668 P2d 406 (1983), “[a] petitioner seeking judicial review under the terms of [ORS 197.650] must base the arguments on the objections (or comments) filed with DLCD; those objections will therefore frame the issues on appeal.”

Barkers Five, LLC v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 323 P.3d 368 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 3× “145 “may be appealed to the Court of Appeals in the manner described in ORS 197.650 and 197.651”); ORS 197.650(2) (“Jurisdiction for judicial review of a final order of [LCDC] issued pursuant to * * * ORS 197.”

Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.), 724 P.2d 268 (Or. 1986). · cites it 2× “ORS 197.650(1). ORS 183.482(8) provides: "(a) The court may affirm, reverse or remand the order.”

Polk Cnty. v. Dep't of Land Conservation & Dev., 176 P.3d 432 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 3× “Standing Under ORS 197.650, an order of LCDC may be appealed to the Court of Appeals in the manner provided in ORS 183.”

Marion Cnty. v. Fed'n for Sound Plan., 668 P.2d 406 (Or. Ct. App. 1983). “ORS 197.650(1) provides: “A commission order may be appealed to the Court of Appeals in the manner provided in ORS 183.”

Roth v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 646 P.2d 85 (Or. Ct. App. 1982). “…of a constitutional or statutory provision, or not supported by substantial evidence. ORS 183.482(8); see also ORS 197.650.”

Zimmerman v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 361 P.3d 619 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). “STANDARDS OF REVIEW We begin by noting one of the difficulties in evaluating petitioner’s contentions on review: Petitioner’s assertions are not framed consistently with our standards of review for an LCDC order on a UGB change.”

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 731 P.2d 457 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). “ORS 197.650(1); ORS 183.482. That manner includes the limitation of our review of the factual findings to a determination of whether there is substantial evidence to support them.”

Coats v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 679 P.2d 898 (Or. Ct. App. 1984). “The administrative rule addresses the same concerns as the adopted LUBA opinion and the requirements of the rule are consistent with LUBA’s interpretation of Goal 5. 5 Reversed and remanded to the circuit court with instructions to remand to LCDC.”

Show all 22 citing cases →

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.650(1) — 16 cases

Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.), 724 P.2d 268 (Or. 1986). “ORS 197.650(1). ORS 183.482(8) provides: "(a) The court may affirm, reverse or remand the order.”

1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 752 P.2d 271 (Or. 1988). “ORS 197.650 directs that appeals of commission orders shall be “in the manner provided in ORS 183.”

Barkers Five, LLC v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 323 P.3d 368 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). “145 “may be appealed to the Court of Appeals in the manner described in ORS 197.650 and 197.651”); ORS 197.650(2) (“Jurisdiction for judicial review of a final order of [LCDC] issued pursuant to * * * ORS 197.”

Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Clatsop Co.), 724 P.2d 805 (Or. 1986). “42 ( sic ) and ORS 197.650. * * *." Shortly after receiving the letter and accompanying orders Clatsop County notified LCDC that Finding of Fact Number 1 in the acknowledgment order was incorrect in stating that Clatsop County's acknowledgment request previously had been…”

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 259 P.3d 1021 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “Federation For Sound Planning, 64 Or App 226, 237 , 668 P2d 406 (1983), “[a] petitioner seeking judicial review under the terms of [ORS 197.650] must base the arguments on the objections (or comments) filed with DLCD; those objections will therefore frame the issues on appeal.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.650(2) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.