198.720
Boundaries; filing boundary change with county assessor and Department of
Revenue. Except as
otherwise specifically provided by the principal Act:
(1) A district
may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous territory located in one or more
adjoining counties. If any part of the territory subject to a petition for
formation or annexation is within a city, the petition shall be accompanied by
a certified copy of a resolution of the governing body of the city approving
the petition.
(2) A district
may not include territory included within another district formed under the
same principal Act when the other district is authorized to perform and is
performing the services the affected district is authorized to perform, unless:
(a) Withdrawal of
such territory is proposed and the territory is withdrawn by withdrawal
proceedings conducted in the other district simultaneously with the formation
or annexation proceedings, and the proposed boundary changes are approved for
both districts; or
(b) The principal
Act provides for automatic withdrawal of the affected territory in such a case.
(3) The boundary
lines of a district formed under ORS 198.705 to 198.955 shall include only such
territory as may in reason be served by the facilities or services of the
district.
(4) For purposes
of ad valorem taxation, a boundary change must be filed in final approved form
with the county assessor and the Department of Revenue as provided in ORS
308.225. [1971 c.727 §5; 2001 c.138 §2]
Notes of Decisions
State Ex Rel. Kirsch v. Curnutt, 853 P.2d 1312 (Or. 1993).
· cites it 61× “At issue in this case is the meaning of ORS 198.720, which provides in part: "Except as otherwise specifically provided by the principal Act: "* * * * * "(2) A district may not include territory included within another district formed under the same principal Act when the other…”
State Ex Rel. City of Powers v. Coos Cnty. Airport Dist., 119 P.3d 225 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 4× “The first claim alleged that the formation of the district was flawed because the county had not obtained resolutions from the plaintiff cities supporting the formation of the district, as required by ORS 198.720(1). [2] The second claim alleged that the individual defendants…”
Kirsch v. Curnutt, 833 P.2d 331 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 2× “ORS 198.720(2) states, in pertinent part: “A district may not include territory included within another district formed under the same principal Act when the other district is authorized to perform and is performing the services the affected district is authorized to perform * *…”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 198.720(1): 1 case
State Ex Rel. City of Powers v. Coos Cnty. Airport Dist., 119 P.3d 225 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
“The first claim alleged that the formation of the district was flawed because the county had not obtained resolutions from the plaintiff cities supporting the formation of the district, as required by ORS 198.720(1). [2] The second claim alleged that the individual defendants…”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 198.720(2): 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Kirsch v. Curnutt, 853 P.2d 1312 (Or. 1993).
“At issue in this case is the meaning of ORS 198.720, which provides in part: "Except as otherwise specifically provided by the principal Act: "* * * * * "(2) A district may not include territory included within another district formed under the same principal Act when the other…”
Kirsch v. Curnutt, 833 P.2d 331 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
“ORS 198.720(2) states, in pertinent part: “A district may not include territory included within another district formed under the same principal Act when the other district is authorized to perform and is performing the services the affected district is authorized to perform * *…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.