199.466
Approval of annexation or extraterritorial extension without study or hearing;
conditions; appeal.
(1) When filing an annexation petition or application under ORS 199.464 (3) or
(4) with a boundary commission, the principal petitioner may request that the
petition or application be approved without the study, public hearing and
adoption of a final order required under ORS 199.461. If such request is made,
the executive officer of the commission, not later than the 15th day after the
filing of the petition or application, shall prepare a brief analysis of the
petition or application and a recommendation for disposition of the proceeding,
and send a copy of the analysis and recommendation to each commission member,
to the governing body of each city, county and district with territory affected
by the annexation or extension, to the owners of the affected territory and to
such other persons as may be required by the commission. If the executive
officer fails to prepare the analysis and recommendation by the 15th day after
the filing of the petition or application, then the petition or application
shall be approved only after the study, public hearing and adoption of the
final order required under ORS 199.461.
(2) If, within 25
days after the filing of an annexation petition or application for an
extraterritorial water or sewer line extension, a person or governing body that
received a copy of the executive officer’s analysis and recommendation under
subsection (1) of this section does not ask in writing for a public hearing on
the proceeding under ORS 199.461, the petition or application shall be
considered approved by the commission. After such approval, the executive
officer of the commission shall send written notification of the approval to
the officials and persons described in ORS 199.461 (5) or (6). For an
annexation petition, the notification shall contain a legal description and map
describing the territory approved for annexation, and for an application under
ORS 199.464 (3) or (4), a general description and map of the territory affected
by the extension. If a request for a public hearing is received by the
commission within the 25-day period after the filing, the commission shall
proceed as provided by ORS 199.460 to 199.463 and 199.490 to 199.534.
(3) Any person,
city, county or district may appeal the approval of a petition or tentative
plans under this section as provided in ORS 199.461 (4). [1981 c.265 §14; 1983
c.336 §12; 1989 c.92 §20]
Notes of Decisions
McGowan v. Lane Cnty. Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 795 P.2d 560 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 13× “Petitioners seek review of respondent boundary commission’s approval of the annexation of intervenor’s 29-acre tract to the city of Eugene through the “expedited” procedures of ORS 199.466. 1 The statute specifically makes the public hearing and related procedural requirements…”
Bellinger v. Lane Cnty. Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 915 P.2d 430 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).
· cites it 21× “Petitioners seek review of the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission’s (commission) expedited approval, pursuant to ORS 199.466, 1 of Junction City’s annexation of property that is proximate to and, apparently, was formerly included in an exclusive farm use zone.”
Mcgowan v. Lane Cty. L. Gov. Bdry. Com'n, 795 P.2d 560 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 13× “Petitioners seek review of respondent boundary commission's approval of the annexation of intervenor's 29-acre tract to the city of Eugene through the "expedited" procedures of ORS 199.466. [1] The statute specifically makes the public hearing and related procedural requirements…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 199.466(1) — 1 case
Bellinger v. Lane Cnty. Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 915 P.2d 430 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).
“Petitioners seek review of the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission’s (commission) expedited approval, pursuant to ORS 199.466, 1 of Junction City’s annexation of property that is proximate to and, apparently, was formerly included in an exclusive farm use zone.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 199.466(3) — 3 cases
McGowan v. Lane Cnty. Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 795 P.2d 560 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
“Petitioners seek review of respondent boundary commission’s approval of the annexation of intervenor’s 29-acre tract to the city of Eugene through the “expedited” procedures of ORS 199.466. 1 The statute specifically makes the public hearing and related procedural requirements…”
Bellinger v. Lane Cnty. Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 915 P.2d 430 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).
“Petitioners seek review of the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission’s (commission) expedited approval, pursuant to ORS 199.466, 1 of Junction City’s annexation of property that is proximate to and, apparently, was formerly included in an exclusive farm use zone.”
Mcgowan v. Lane Cty. L. Gov. Bdry. Com'n, 795 P.2d 560 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
“Petitioners seek review of respondent boundary commission's approval of the annexation of intervenor's 29-acre tract to the city of Eugene through the "expedited" procedures of ORS 199.466. [1] The statute specifically makes the public hearing and related procedural requirements…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.