Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 199.519 (2026)

Effective date of boundary change; filing boundary change with county assessor and Department of Revenue

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      199.519 Effective date of boundary change; filing boundary change with county assessor and Department of Revenue. (1) Notwithstanding any different effective date specified in ORS 199.480, 199.505 or 199.507, a boundary change under ORS 199.410 to 199.534 shall not become effective during the period:

      (a) Beginning after the 90th day before a primary election or general election and ending on the day after the election; or

      (b) Beginning after the deadline for filing the notice of election before any other election held by any city or district involved in the boundary change and ending on the day after the election.

      (2) If the effective date established for a boundary change is a date that is prohibited under this section, the boundary change shall become effective on the day after the election for voting purposes.

      (3) The provisions of this section do not apply if the territory affected by the boundary change has no registered voters.

      (4) For purposes of ad valorem taxation, a boundary change must be filed in final approved form with the county assessor and the Department of Revenue as provided in ORS 308.225. [1981 c.391 §1; 1985 c.808 §68; 1989 c.92 §26; 1989 c.923 §24; 1995 c.712 §86; 2001 c.138 §4]

      199.520 [1969 c.494 §20; 1971 c.462 §9; renumbered 199.463]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1984–1984 · leading case: Rivergate Residents Ass'n v. Portland Metro. Area Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 689 P.2d 326 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
Rivergate Residents Ass'n v. Portland Metro. Area Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 689 P.2d 326 (Or. Ct. App. 1984). “” 6 The purposes of ORS 199.519 are to: “(a) Provide a method for guiding the creation and growth of cities and special service districts in Oregon in order to prevent illogical extensions of local government boundaries; “(b) Assure adequate quality and quantity of public…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.