Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 215.301 (2026)

Blending materials for cement prohibited near vineyards; exception

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      215.301 Blending materials for cement prohibited near vineyards; exception. (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of ORS 215.213, 215.283 and 215.284, no application shall be approved to allow batching and blending of mineral and aggregate into asphalt cement within two miles of a planted vineyard.

      (2) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to apply to operations for batching and blending of mineral and aggregate under a local land use approval on October 3, 1989, or a subsequent renewal of an existing approval.

      (3) Nothing in ORS 215.213, 215.263, 215.283, 215.284, 215.296 or 215.298 shall be construed to apply to a use allowed under ORS 215.213 (2) or 215.283 (2) and approved by a local governing body on October 3, 1989, or a subsequent renewal of an existing approval. [1989 c.861 §§4,5]

 

      215.303 [1989 c.861 §8; repealed by 1993 c.792 §55]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1993–1995 · leading case: O'MARA v. Douglas Cnty., 862 P.2d 499 (Or. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
O'MARA v. Douglas Cnty., 862 P.2d 499 (Or. 1993). · cites it 8× “ORS 215.301, originally adopted by the legislature in 1989, provides: “Notwithstanding the provisions of ORS 215.”
Severy v. Bd. of Parole, 864 P.2d 368 (Or. 1993). “105 and ORS chapter 144 with regard to “unsumming” consecutive sentences for aggravated murder, ORS 163.”
O'Mara v. Douglas Cnty., 854 P.2d 470 (Or. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 12× “Although LUBA remanded the county decision on other grounds, it rejected petitioners’ argument that the issuance of the permit violates ORS 215.301. Petitioners seek review and assign error to LUBA’s ruling on that assignment.”
Mission Bottom Ass'n v. Marion Cnty., 901 P.2d 898 (Or. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 5× “301(2); and the expanded use as a whole does not qualify for approval under ORS 215.301. ORS 215.301 provides: *278 “(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of ORS 215.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 215.301(2) — 1 case
Mission Bottom Ass'n v. Marion Cnty., 901 P.2d 898 (Or. Ct. App. 1995). “301(2); and the expanded use as a whole does not qualify for approval under ORS 215.301. ORS 215.301 provides: *278 “(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of ORS 215.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.