Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 223.302 (2026)

System development charges; use of revenues; review procedures

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      223.302 System development charges; use of revenues; review procedures. (1) Local governments are authorized to establish system development charges, but the revenues produced therefrom must be expended only in accordance with ORS 223.297 to 223.316. If a local government expends revenues from system development charges in violation of the limitations described in ORS 223.307, the local government shall replace the misspent amount with moneys derived from sources other than system development charges. Replacement moneys must be deposited in a fund designated for the system development charge revenues not later than one year following a determination that the funds were misspent.

      (2) Local governments shall adopt administrative review procedures by which any citizen or other interested person may challenge an expenditure of system development charge revenues. Such procedures shall provide that such a challenge must be filed within two years of the expenditure of the system development charge revenues. The decision of the local government shall be judicially reviewed only as provided in ORS 34.010 to 34.100.

      (3)(a) A local government must advise a person who makes a written objection to the calculation of a system development charge of the right to petition for review pursuant to ORS 34.010 to 34.100.

      (b) If a local government has adopted an administrative review procedure for objections to the calculation of a system development charge, the local government shall provide adequate notice regarding the procedure for review to a person who makes a written objection to the calculation of a system development charge. [1989 c.449 §3; 1991 c.902 §27; 2001 c.662 §2; 2003 c.765 §3; 2003 c.802 §20]

 

      Note: See note under 223.297.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2005–2007 · leading case: State ex rel. City of Powers v. Coos Cnty. Airport Dist., 119 P.3d 225 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. City of Powers v. Coos Cnty. Airport Dist., 119 P.3d 225 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “[8] See ORS 223.302(2) (providing that decision of local government expending system development charge revenues "shall be judicially reviewed only as provided in ORS 34.”
Home Builders Ass'n of Metro. Portland v. City of West Linn, 131 P.3d 805 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “See ORS 223.302(2) (providing for administrative and judicial review of expenditures of SDC funds).”
Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Springfield, 156 P.3d 167 (Or. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “One of those statutes, ORS 223.302(3)(a), provides the exclusive means to challenge methodologies for system development charges.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 223.302(2): 2 cases
State ex rel. City of Powers v. Coos Cnty. Airport Dist., 119 P.3d 225 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). “[8] See ORS 223.302(2) (providing that decision of local government expending system development charge revenues "shall be judicially reviewed only as provided in ORS 34.”
Home Builders Ass'n of Metro. Portland v. City of West Linn, 131 P.3d 805 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “See ORS 223.302(2) (providing for administrative and judicial review of expenditures of SDC funds).”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 223.302(3)(a): 1 case
Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Springfield, 156 P.3d 167 (Or. Ct. App. 2007). “One of those statutes, ORS 223.302(3)(a), provides the exclusive means to challenge methodologies for system development charges.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.