244.025 Gift
limit. (1) During
a calendar year, a public official, a candidate or a relative or member of the
household of the public official or candidate may not solicit or receive,
directly or indirectly, any gift or gifts with an aggregate value in excess of
$50 from any single source that could reasonably be known to have a legislative
or administrative interest.
(2) During a
calendar year, a person who has a legislative or administrative interest may
not offer to the public official or a relative or member of the household of
the public official any gift or gifts with an aggregate value in excess of $50.
(3) During a
calendar year, a person who has a legislative or administrative interest may
not offer to the candidate or a relative or member of the household of the
candidate any gift or gifts with an aggregate value in excess of $50.
(4) This section
does not apply to public officials subject to the Oregon Code of Judicial
Conduct. [2007 c.877 §18; 2009 c.68 §3]
244.030 [1974 c.72 §24; repealed by 2007
c.865 §41]
Notes of Decisions
Vannatta v. Oregon Gov't Ethics Comm'n, 222 P.3d 1077 (Or. 2009).
· cites it 20× “” Plaintiffs assert that, because of the restrictions in ORS 244.025 and ORS 244.042, “plaintiffs and some (but not all) other lobbyists in Oregon are prevented from engaging” in *452 those activities and those activities are forms of expression protected by the state and…”
Multnomah Cnty. v. Mehrwein, 462 P.3d 706 (Or. 2020).
· cites it 2× “For example, ORS 244.025(1) prohibited (and prohibits) public officials, candidates, and their relatives from receiving gifts in excess of $50 from a source with a legislative or administrative interest.”
Vannatta v. Oregon Gov't Ethics Comm'n, 228 P.3d 574 (Or. 2010).
· cites it 10× “This court held that the parts of ORS 244.025(1) to (4) and ORS 244.042 that restrict the receipt of gifts and payment of expenses for entertainment did not violate the constitutional provisions relied on by petitioners.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 244.025(1) — 3 cases
Vannatta v. Oregon Gov't Ethics Comm'n, 222 P.3d 1077 (Or. 2009).
“” Plaintiffs assert that, because of the restrictions in ORS 244.025 and ORS 244.042, “plaintiffs and some (but not all) other lobbyists in Oregon are prevented from engaging” in *452 those activities and those activities are forms of expression protected by the state and…”
Multnomah Cnty. v. Mehrwein, 462 P.3d 706 (Or. 2020).
“For example, ORS 244.025(1) prohibited (and prohibits) public officials, candidates, and their relatives from receiving gifts in excess of $50 from a source with a legislative or administrative interest.”
Vannatta v. Oregon Gov't Ethics Comm'n, 228 P.3d 574 (Or. 2010).
“This court held that the parts of ORS 244.025(1) to (4) and ORS 244.042 that restrict the receipt of gifts and payment of expenses for entertainment did not violate the constitutional provisions relied on by petitioners.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 244.025(2) — 2 cases
Vannatta v. Oregon Gov't Ethics Comm'n, 222 P.3d 1077 (Or. 2009).
“” Plaintiffs assert that, because of the restrictions in ORS 244.025 and ORS 244.042, “plaintiffs and some (but not all) other lobbyists in Oregon are prevented from engaging” in *452 those activities and those activities are forms of expression protected by the state and…”
Vannatta v. Oregon Gov't Ethics Comm'n, 228 P.3d 574 (Or. 2010).
“This court held that the parts of ORS 244.025(1) to (4) and ORS 244.042 that restrict the receipt of gifts and payment of expenses for entertainment did not violate the constitutional provisions relied on by petitioners.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 244.025(4)(a) — 2 cases
Vannatta v. Oregon Gov't Ethics Comm'n, 222 P.3d 1077 (Or. 2009).
“” Plaintiffs assert that, because of the restrictions in ORS 244.025 and ORS 244.042, “plaintiffs and some (but not all) other lobbyists in Oregon are prevented from engaging” in *452 those activities and those activities are forms of expression protected by the state and…”
Multnomah Cnty. v. Mehrwein, 462 P.3d 706 (Or. 2020).
“For example, ORS 244.025(1) prohibited (and prohibits) public officials, candidates, and their relatives from receiving gifts in excess of $50 from a source with a legislative or administrative interest.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 244.025(4)(b) — 1 case
Vannatta v. Oregon Gov't Ethics Comm'n, 222 P.3d 1077 (Or. 2009).
“” Plaintiffs assert that, because of the restrictions in ORS 244.025 and ORS 244.042, “plaintiffs and some (but not all) other lobbyists in Oregon are prevented from engaging” in *452 those activities and those activities are forms of expression protected by the state and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.