246.200 County
clerk to conduct elections; exceptions. (1) Except as otherwise provided by law, the county
clerk is the only elections officer who may conduct an election in this state.
For purposes of this section, the conduct of an election includes, but is not
limited to, establishing precincts, preparing ballots and sample ballots, and
receiving and processing votes.
(2)
Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section:
(a) The county
clerk is not the only elections officer who may accept and verify a filing for
nomination or filing of a petition, prepare a voters’ pamphlet or ballot title,
or prepare or publish an election notice; and
(b) The Secretary
of State may receive ballots as provided in ORS 253.585. [1979 c.317 §1; 1983
c.350 §63a; 1987 c.535 §1; 2003 c.64 §3; 2007 c.154 §4]
Notes of Decisions
City of Eugene v. Roberts, 756 P.2d 630 (Or. 1988).
· cites it 25× “By this argument, we understand that the City concedes that the state may regulate the time, place and manner of city elections in order to then be able to argue that home rule requires state and county officials to conduct votes of the city's choosing, at *636 the city's…”
City of Eugene v. Roberts, 756 P.2d 643 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
· cites it 6× “It explains: “Defendants argue that the clerk’s ORS 246.200 duty to ‘prepare] ballots’ is more than ministerial, that this duty allows *6 the county clerk to determine which measures and items should be on the ballot.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 246.200(1): 2 cases
City of Eugene v. Roberts, 756 P.2d 630 (Or. 1988).
“By this argument, we understand that the City concedes that the state may regulate the time, place and manner of city elections in order to then be able to argue that home rule requires state and county officials to conduct votes of the city's choosing, at *636 the city's…”
City of Eugene v. Roberts, 756 P.2d 643 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
“It explains: “Defendants argue that the clerk’s ORS 246.200 duty to ‘prepare] ballots’ is more than ministerial, that this duty allows *6 the county clerk to determine which measures and items should be on the ballot.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.