Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 250.015 (2026)

Form of petition; numbering of signature sheets; rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      250.015 Form of petition; numbering of signature sheets; rules. The Secretary of State by rule shall:

      (1) Design the form of the prospective petition, and the initiative and the referendum petition, including the signature sheets, to be used in any initiative or referendum in this state.

      (2) Designate the quality of paper to be used for signature sheets in order to ensure the legibility of the signatures.

      (3) Prescribe a system for numbering the signature sheets to be used in any initiative or referendum in this state. [1979 c.190 §141; 1979 c.345 §1; 1981 c.909 §1; 1989 c.68 §5; 2005 c.22 §188]

 

      250.020 [Amended by 1957 c.608 §121; 1961 c.121 §4; 1979 c.190 §232; 1979 c.519 §17; renumbered 254.085]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1990–2017 · leading case: Crumpton v. Roberts, 798 P.2d 1100 (Or. 1990).
Crumpton v. Roberts, 798 P.2d 1100 (Or. 1990). “ORS 250.015(1) requires the Secretary of State to “[d]esign the form of the prospective petition, and the initiative and the referendum petition.”
Rasmussen v. Kroger, 253 P.3d 1037 (Or. 2011). “045(3) (providing that the secretary shall, “by rule * * * establish procedures for verifying whether a prospective petition for a state measure to be initiated contains the required number of signatures of electors”); ORS 250.”
Unger v. Rosenblum (Or. 2017). “, ORS 250.015(1); ORS 250.045(3); ORS 250.067(5).”
Unger v. Rosenblum (Or. 2017). “, ORS 250.015(1); ORS 250.045(3); ORS 250.067(5).”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 250.015(1): 3 cases
Crumpton v. Roberts, 798 P.2d 1100 (Or. 1990). “ORS 250.015(1) requires the Secretary of State to “[d]esign the form of the prospective petition, and the initiative and the referendum petition.”
Unger v. Rosenblum (Or. 2017). “, ORS 250.015(1); ORS 250.045(3); ORS 250.067(5).”
Unger v. Rosenblum (Or. 2017). “, ORS 250.015(1); ORS 250.045(3); ORS 250.067(5).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.